Magnus Gulbrandsen

• Enger, Simen G. & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2020). Orchestrating collaborative projects: Inside ICT networks in Horizon 2020. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  s 1- 20 . doi: 10.1093/scipol/scaa021 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Rasmussen, Einar; Benneworth, Paul & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2020). Motivating universities to support spin-off firms: Stakeholders and start-up incubation ecosystems, In Adam Novotny; Einar Rasmussen; Tommy Høyvarde Clausen & Johan Wiklund (ed.),  Research handbook on start-up incubation ecosystems.  Edward Elgar Publishing.  ISBN 9781788973526.  23.  s 418 - 434
• Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2018). Researcher identities and practices inside centres of excellence. Triple Helix: A Journal of University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship.  ISSN 2590-0366.  5(14) . doi: 10.1186/s40604-018-0059-3 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  Many science support mechanisms aim to combine excellent research with explicit expectations of societal impact. Temporary research centres such as ‘Centres of Excellence’ and ‘Centre of Excellence in Research and Innovation’ have become widespread. These centres are expected to produce research that creates future economic benefits and contributes to solving society’s challenges, but little is known about the researchers that inhabit such centres. In this paper, we ask how and to what extent centres affect individual researchers’ identity and scientific practice. Based on interviews with 33 researchers affiliated with 8 centres in Sweden and Norway, and on institutional logics as the analytical framework, we find 4 broad types of identities with corresponding practices. The extent to which individuals experience tensions depend upon the compatibility and centrality of the two institutional logics of excellence and innovation within the centre context. Engagement in innovation seems unproblematic and common in research-oriented centres where the centrality of the innovation logic is low, while individuals in centres devoted to both science and innovation in emerging fields of research or with weak social ties to their partners more frequently expressed tension and dissatisfaction.

• Castellacci, Fulvio; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Hildrum, Jarle; Martinkenaite, Ieva & Simensen, Erlend Osland (2018). Functional centrality and innovation intensity: Employee-level analysis of the Telenor group. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333. . doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.004 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2017). The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance. Journal of Technology Transfer.  ISSN 0892-9912.  42(4), s 795- 813 . doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9556-1 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2017). Combining knowledge to generate novelty: a study of disclosed ideas for life science inventions. European Journal of Innovation Management.  ISSN 1460-1060.  20(3), s 446- 462 . doi: 10.1108/EJIM-11-2016-0114 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Thune, Taran Mari; Reymert, Ingvild; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Aamodt, Per O (2016). Universities and external engagement activities: Particular profiles for particular universities?. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  43(6), s 774- 786 . doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw019 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  We use a multilevel regression approach on a complex combined dataset including a survey of 4,400 Norwegian academics and detailed data on the 31 higher education institutions in which they are employed. The aim is to test whether university-level characteristics matter for participation in different kinds of external engagement, when we also control for the influence of individual- and discipline-level factors. We find that university-level variables explain few of the differences in external engagement among academic staff in general.

• Bentley, Peter; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Kyvik, Svein (2015). The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education.  ISSN 0018-1560.  70(4), s 689- 709 . doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9861-2 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Borlaug, Siri Brorstad; Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2015). Samspill mellom utdanning, forskning og innovasjon - kunnskapstriangelet i politikk og praksis, I: Nicoline Frølich (red.),  Hva skjer i universiteter og høgskoler? Perspektiver fra vitenskapelig ansatte og studenter.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 9788215024349.  Kapittel 10.  s 136 - 148
• Frølich, Nicoline; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Stensaker, Bjørn (2015). Hva har skjedd i universiteter og høgskoler?, I: Nicoline Frølich (red.),  Hva skjer i universiteter og høgskoler? Perspektiver fra vitenskapelig ansatte og studenter.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 9788215024349.  Kapittel 12.  s 163 - 170
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Aamodt, Per O & Thune, Taran Mari (2015). Ja takk, begge deler? Grunnforskning og anvendt forskning i universiteter og høgskoler, I: Nicoline Frølich (red.),  Hva skjer i universiteter og høgskoler? Perspektiver fra vitenskapelig ansatte og studenter.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 9788215024349.  Kapittel 8.  s 108 - 118
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Aanstad, Siri (2015). Is innovation a useful concept for arts and humanities research?. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education.  ISSN 1474-0222.  14(1), s 9- 24 . doi: 10.1177/1474022214533890
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Solesvik, Marina (2015). Comparing University-Industry Linkages in Two Industrial Clusters in Norway. Academy of Management. Annual Meeting Proceedings.  ISSN 0065-0668.  2015(1), s 18826- 18826 . doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.18826abstract
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Thune, Taran Mari; Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Hanson, Jens (2015). Emerging Hybrid Practises In Public–Private Research Centres. Public Administration.  ISSN 0033-3298.  93(2), s 363- 379 . doi: 10.1111/padm.12140 Vis sammendrag

  In this article we use a comparative case study of collaborative research centres that operate at the interface between public science and private industry to question the assumption that hybrid organizations lead to hybrid practices. Public–private partnerships are intended to contribute to new work practices that solve challenges in public service provision and influence industrial innovativeness by engaging public research capabilities. Analysis of eight Scandinavian centres indicates considerable variance with respect to levels of integration of public and private partners and tensions between them. Five of the cases display no or highly contested hybrid practices and there seem to be many barriers to hybridization. Large differences in work practices from earlier interaction between the partners and radical goals of commercialization of excellent public science are important explanations.

• Thune, Taran Mari; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Aamodt, Per O (2015). Nettverk sett nedenfra. Samarbeid og kunnskapsoverføring blant vitenskapelig ansatte, I: Nicoline Frølich (red.),  Hva skjer i universiteter og høgskoler? Perspektiver fra vitenskapelig ansatte og studenter.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 9788215024349.  Kapittel 11.  s 150 - 161
• Solesvik, Marina & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2014). Interaction for Innovation: Comparing Norwegian Regions. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation (JEMI).  ISSN 2299-7075.  10(3), s 7- 28 . doi: 10.7341/20141031 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2014). Dynamics of collaboration in university–industry partnerships: do initial conditions explain development patterns?. Journal of Technology Transfer.  ISSN 0892-9912.  39(6), s 977- 993 . doi: 10.1007/s10961-014-9331-5
• Solesvik, Marina & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2013). Partner selection for open innovation. Technology innovation management review.  ISSN 1927-0321.  7(4), s 11- 16 . doi: 10.22215/timreview/674
• Clausen, Tommy Høyvarde; Fagerberg, Jan & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2012). Mobilizing for change: A study of research units in emerging scientific fields. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333.  41, s 1249- 1261 . doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.014
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Kyvik, Svein (2012). FoU-begrepet i universitetssektoren, I: Karl Erik Brofoss & Randi Søgnen (red.),  FoU-begrepet under press. Om møtet mellom forskningspolitikk og forskningsstatistikk.  Tapir Akademisk Forlag.  ISBN 978-82-519-2526-6.  Kapittel 7.  s 117 - 136
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Rasmussen, Einar (2012). The use and development of indicators for the commercialisation of university research in a national support programme. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.  ISSN 0953-7325.  24(5), s 481- 495 . doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.674670
• Rasmussen, Einar & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2012). Government Support Programmes to Promote Academic Entrepreneurship: A Principal-Agent Perspective. European Planning Studies.  ISSN 0965-4313.  20(4), s 527- 546 . doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.665035
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2011). Kristian Birkelands spøkelse: Universitetet i Oslo og innovasjon, I:  Universitetet i Oslo: Samtidshistoriske perspektiver.  Unipub forlag.  ISBN 978-82-7477-545-9.  Del 4.  s 275 - 365
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2011). Research institutes as hybrid organizations: central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy sciences.  ISSN 0032-2687.  44(3), s 215- 230 . doi: 10.1007/s11077-011-9128-4
• Thune, Taran & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2011). Institutionalization of university-industry interaction: an empirical study of the impact of formal structures on collaboration patterns. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  38(2), s 99- 107 . doi: 10.3152/030234211X12924093660110
• Bjørnåli, Ekaterina Shepeleva & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Exploring board formation and evolution of board composition in academic spin-offs. Journal of Technology Transfer.  ISSN 0892-9912.  35(1), s 92- 112 . doi: 10.1007/s10961-009-9115-5 Vis sammendrag

  An in-depth analysis of 11 cases is used to provide insight into the neglected area of the dynamics of boards in academic spin-offs. Drawing on stage-based, resource dependence, and social network theories, we explore board formation and changes in board composition occurring in Norwegian and US spin-offs. We find that these theories are important complements to earlier research on boards in technology-based new ventures. The process of board formation is mainly driven by social networks of the founders. Although we find differences in the initial board compositions in Norwegian and US spin-offs, there is convergence over time in subsequent board changes, which are mainly driven by the social networks of the board chair. Additions of key board members are associated with the progress of a spin-off developing from one stage to another. Several avenues for future research and implications are discussed.

• Fæhn, Taran; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Lindegaard, Are (2010). Hva vil Norges klimakur koste?. Samfunnsøkonomen.  ISSN 1890-5250.  64(5), s 4- 15
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). The relationship between a university and its technology transfer office: the case of NTNU in Norway. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation.  ISSN 1470-6075.  9, s 25- 39
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Kyvik, Svein (2010). Are the concepts basic research, applied research and experimental development still useful? An empirical investigation among Norwegian academics. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  37(5), s 343- 353 . doi: 10.3152/030234210X501171
• Klitkou, Antje & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). The relationship between academic patenting and scientific publishing in Norway. Scientometrics.  ISSN 0138-9130.  82(1), s 93- 108 . doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0050-x
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). The co-evolution of research institutes with universities and user needs: A historical perspective, In Eli Moen (ed.),  Science and society relationships in the age of globalization: past reforms and future challenges.  The Research Council of Norway.  ISBN 978-82-12-02607-0.  Artikkel.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). The role of basic research in innovation, In Willy Østreng (ed.),  Confluence. Interdisciplinary Communications 2007/2008.  Centre for Advanced Study at the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters.  ISBN 978-82-996367-6-6.  Artikkel.  s 55 - 58

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Benneworth, Paul & Hazelkorn, Ellen (2016). The Impact and Future of Arts and Humanities Research. Palgrave Macmillan.  ISBN 978-1-137-40898-3.  220 s. Vis sammendrag

  Drawing on original international research by a cross-European social science team, this book makes an important contribution to the discussion about the future of arts and humanities research. It explores the responses of these fields to the growing range of questions being asked about the value, impact and benefit of publicly-funded research. The objective is to better understand what really matters rather than what is easily measured. The book increases our understanding of the contribution which university-based arts and humanities research makes to society and the economy by exploring how it is defined, appreciated and accounted for by researchers, policymakers and civil society. It identifies appropriate practices and methodologies to assess and demonstrate quality and value beyond the academy. The book will be essential reading for researchers and policymakers, as well as research organisations and anyone interested in the arts and humanities.

• Anker, Peder; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Larsen, Eirinn; Løvhaug, Johannes Waage; Tranøy, Bent Sofus; Collett, John Peter; Benum, Edgeir Reidar; Gjestland, Dag & Torgersen, Ivar (2011). Universitetet i Oslo: Samtidshistoriske perspektiver. Unipub forlag.  ISBN 978-82-7477-545-9.  568 s.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2020). Jubileum for tidenes viktigste forskningspolitiske dokument [75-årsjubileum for rapporten Science The Endless Frontier]. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  43(3), s 37- 39
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Simensen, Erlend Osland & Thune, Taran Mari (2020). Hva vil brukerne av forskning ha?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  43(3), s 20- 21
• Borlaug, Siri Brorstad; Langfeldt, Liv; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Ramberg, Inge (2019). Impacts of the SFF scheme on the Norwegian research system: Sub-report I to the SFF evaluation panel. NIFU-rapport. 28. Vis sammendrag

  This report was commissioned by the Research Council of Norway (RCN) to serve as background information for an international scientific committee appointed to evaluate the SFF scheme. The report should be seen in conjunction with the parallel NIFU report providing bibliometric analysis and career mapping for the same evaluation (Sivertsen et al. 2019).

• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2019). Hva er forskjellen på fysikk, kjemi og biologi?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  42(1), s 10- 11
• Høiland, Gry Cecilie & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2019). 'An easy match? Evidence-based policy meets science-based impact' Working paper for EU-SPRI conference 2019.
• Høiland, Gry Cecilie & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2019). Better together A critical discussion of the relationship between research and innovation in policy and practice.
• Maassen, Peter; Andreadakis, Zacharias; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Stensaker, Bjørn (2019). The Place of Universities in Society.
• Sivertsen, Gunnar & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2019). Impact i anvendt forskning: begrepsavklaring og praksis.
• Tellmann, Silje Maria; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Høiland, Gry Cecilie (2019). Practices in Public Agencies’ R&D Departments.
• Thune, Taran Mari; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Tellmann, Silje Maria & Skogen, Kari-Elisabeth Vambeseth (2019). Kortreist kunnskap. Stat og styring.  ISSN 0803-0103.  29(2)
• Andersen, Allan Dahl & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2018). Diversification into new markets: challenges and opportunities for petroleum supply firms, In Taran Mari Thune; Ole Andreas Hegland Engen & Olav Wicken (ed.),  Petroleum industry transformations : lessons from Norway and beyond.  Routledge.  ISBN 9781315142456.  12.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Sivertsen, Gunnar (2018). Impact i anvendt forskning: begrepsavklaring og praksis. NIFU-rapport. 10. Vis sammendrag

  Formålet med dette arbeidsnotatet er å drøfte to spørsmål: Hva menes med begrepet impact, og hvordan passer det for anvendt forskning?

• Sivertsen, Gunnar & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2018). Impact i anvendt forskning: begrepsavklaring og praksis.
• Frølich, Nicoline; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Vabø, Agnete; Wiers-Jenssen, Jannecke & Aamodt, Per O (2016). Kvalitet og samspill i universitets- og høgskolesektoren. NIFU-rapport. 2.
• Grimsby, Gard Sveinung; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Risvik, Einar & Kure, Cathrine F. (2016). Open innovation, co-creation and closed product development in the Norwegian cereal industry.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2016). The humanities in Norway: research, research organisation and external engagement. NIFU-rapport. 36. Vis sammendrag

  The humanities are widely discussed in the science policy debate in Norway. Several books have been published on the field’s nature and uniqueness, and its framework conditions are discussed in leading newspapers and especially in the weekly Morgenbladet, which for a long time ran a series about the “crisis in the humanities”. The field is currently undergoing one of the regular large-scale evaluations coordinated by the Research Council of Norway, and a White Paper on the humanities will be published in 2017. For all these purposes it is important to base them on solid empirical knowledge about what humanities researchers actually do, how they organise their research activities and how they collaborate inside and outside the higher education sector. In this report new analyses are carried out on a large-scale dataset based on a survey to tenured scientific personnel in Norwegian universities and colleges.

• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Hopkins, Michael; Thune, Taran Mari & Valentin, Finn (2016). Hospitals and innovation: Introduction to the special section. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333.  45(8), s 1493- 1498 . doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.010
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2016). Ikke-akademisk arbeidserfaring: bra for relevans, ikke for kvalitet?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  38(1), s 28- 29
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Klitkou, Antje (2015). Firms’ collaboration with domestic and foreign universities: what can co-authorship data tell us?. Vis sammendrag

  This paper has two aims. First, to map the development of Norwegian private firms’ scientific co-authorship over the last 20 years. Second, to use knowledge of central events in the Norwegian research system to reflect upon the patterns seen in the data. The basic question we want to explore is whether we see signs of a mismatch between the knowledge needs of Norwegian industry and the profile of the domestic public research organisations. We ask the following specific research questions: Do Norwegian firms collaborate more over time with foreign universities, and does this come at the expense of national collaboration? Has the pattern of domestic collaboration changed with respect to the types of organisations that firms publish with?

• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2015). Samspill i medisinsk innovasjon, I: Kristin Oxley (red.),  Eksellens. Innovasjon. Effekt. Resultater fra forskningen. Program: Kunnskapsgrunnlaget for forsknings- og innovasjonspolitikken - FORFI.  Norges forskningsråd.  ISBN 978-82-12-03395-5.  Kapittel 2, del 2.  s 34 - 38
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2015). Universitetenes roller i innovasjon: Kunnskapsstatus, I: Kristin Oxley (red.),  Eksellens. Innovasjon. Effekt. Resultater fra forskningen. Program: Kunnskapsgrunnlaget for forsknings- og innovasjonspolitikken - FORFI.  Norges forskningsråd.  ISBN 978-82-12-03395-5.  Kapittel 2, del 1.  s 26 - 33
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Forsberg, Ellen-Marie (2014). How can innovations be governed¬? Reflections on RRI from an innovation perspective..
• Thune, Taran Mari; Aamodt, Per O & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2014). Forskere deler sin kunnskap. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  37(4), s 4- 5
• Thune, Taran Mari; Aamodt, Per O & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2014). Noder i kunnskapsnettverket: Forskning, kunnskapsoverføring og eksternt samarbeid blant vitenskapelig ansatte i UH-sektoren. NIFU-rapport. 23.
• Rasmussen, Einar; Benneworth, Paul & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2013). Developing University Innovation Capacity: How can innovation policy effectively harness universities? capability to promote high-growth technology businesses?.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Bye, Geir; Finne, Håkon & Njøs, Rune (2013). Er samarbeid alltid bra for innovasjon?. Plan: Tidsskrift for samfunnsplanlegging, byplan og regional utvikling.  ISSN 0805-083X.  (6), s 4- 9
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2013). Helseinnovasjon krever samarbeid. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  36(4), s 14-15
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Lekve, Kyrre; Rasmussen, Einar; Skule, Sveinung; Slipersæter, Stig & Stensaker, Bjørn (2012). Samspill i kunnskapstriangelet. Innspill til Kunnskapsdepartementets arbeid med forskningsmeldingen 2013.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Ramberg, Inge; Sarpebakken, Bo; Schwach, Vera; Sivertsen, Gunnar; Solberg, Espen & Wiig, Ole (2012). Er det noen SAK? Instituttsektorens rolle og organisering i Norge med spesiell vekt på samarbeid, arbeidsdeling og konsentrasjon (SAK). NIFU-rapport. 50.
• Hildrum, Jarle Moss & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2012). Mer FoU i Telenor enn antatt. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  35(4), s 22- 23
• Scordato, Lisa; Søreide, Frode Hovland & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2012). The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and global health issues. Chapter 3 in Meeting Global Challenges through Better Governance: International Co-operation in Science, Technology and Innovation.
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2012). Dynamics of cooperation in research and innovation partnerships.
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2012). Synergies and tensions in innovation in the life sciences.
• Thune, Taran Mari; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Hanson, Jens (2012). Frontier research and mission oriented policies in university-based innovation centers- towards a new hybrid order?.
• Thune, Taran Mari; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Klitkou, Antje; Ramberg, Inge; Aanstad, Siri & Olsen, Dorothy Sutherland (2012). Produktivt samspill?: Forsknings- og innovasjonssamarbeid mellom næringsliv og FoU-miljøer. NIFU-rapport. 24.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Aanstad, Siri (2011). Nyttig forskning i kunstfag og humaniora?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  34(3), s 11- 13
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Kyvik, Svein (2011). Grunnforskningen står sterkt i Norge. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  34(4)
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Mowery, David & Feldman, Maryann (2011). Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and university-industry relations. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333.  40(1), s 1- 5 . doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.007
• Kyvik, Svein & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2011). Forskningspraksis ved norske universiteter i et internasjonalt perspektiv.
• Kyvik, Svein; Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Bentley, Peter (2011). Forskningspraksis ved norske universiteter i et internasjonalt perspektiv: En sammenligning av 14 land. NIFU-rapport. 41.
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2011). Produktive samspill? - noen resultater fra en casestudie av forskningssamarbeid.
• Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Between excellence and innovation - Research practices and tensions in Centres of Excellence and Expertise.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Aldri fornøyd? Noen forklaringer på gapet mellom universitetsforskningens utvikling og universitetsforskernes oppfatninger.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Det samfunnsengasjerte universitet: Indikatorer for bedre dialog med samfunnet.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Finansiering, kvalitet og forskningsmiljøer.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Internasjonale og nasjonale trender for innovasjon ved universitetene.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Patentering av universitetsforskning.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Universiteters og forskningsinstitutters rolle for innovasjon i Norge.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Langfeldt, Liv (2010). Høy kvalitet i forskningen.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2010). Cross-sector collaboration in Norway: institutionalization through large-scale university-industry interaction?.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2010). Forskning er lett, innovasjon er vanskelig. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  3, s 12- 13
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2010). Institutionalized forms of university-industry collaboration: a dynamic process perspective.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus & Thune, Taran Mari (2010). University-Industry Collaboration: Towards a Dynamic Process Perspective.
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Thune, Taran Mari & Borlaug, Siri Brorstad (2010). Centers of excellence as hybrid space.
• Kallerud, Egil & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Politiske tall - Intervju med Benoît Godin. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  (4)
• Langfeldt, Liv; Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). Sentre som endrer forskningslandskapet. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  (3), s 10- 11
• Langfeldt, Liv; Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). The Norwegian Centre of Excellence Scheme Evaluation of Added Value and Financial Aspects. NIFU STEP rapport. 29.
• Thune, Taran Mari & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2010). The evolvement of inter-organizational relations: exploring the dynamics of collaboration in university - industry partnerships.
• Borlaug, Siri Brorstad; Grünfeld, Leo A.; Gulbrandsen, Magnus; Rasmussen, Einar; Rønning, Lars; Spilling, Olav R. & Vinogradov, Evgueni (2009). Between entrepreneurship and technology transfer: Evaluation of the FORNY programme. NIFU STEP rapport. 19.
• Borlaug, Siri Brorstad & Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). Uklare resultater av kommersialisering. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  2
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). Avhengige av andres grunnforskning. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  (2)
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). Hva skal forskningspolitikken baseres på?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  32(2)
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). Manglende peronalpolitikk?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  32(4)
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). Mindre prioritering enn ønskelig?. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  (4)
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). Samspill og kommersialisering som før. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  (2)
• Gulbrandsen, Magnus (2009). The Triple Helix in the social sciences - the case of Norwegian industrial social research.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin