Christopher Lord

Bøker

• Lord, C. and Harris, E. (2006) Democracy in the new Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave/Macmillan.
• Lord, C. (2004) A Democratic Audit of the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
• Lord, C. (1998) Democracy in the European Union, London, UACES.
• Beetham, D. and Lord, C. (1998) Legitimacy and the European Union, London: Longman.
• Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997) Political Parties and the European Union, Basingstoke, Macmillan.

Artikler

• Lord, C. (forthcoming) 'Polecats, Lions and Foxes: Coasian Bargaining Theory and attempts to legitimate the Union as a Constrained form of Political Power', European Political Science Review.
• Lord, C. and Pollak, J. (2010) ‘The EU’s Many Representative Modes: Colliding? Cohering?’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(1): 117-36.
• Lord, C. (2008) ‘Two Constitutionalisms? A Comparison of British and French attempts to legitimise the Constitutional Treaty’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(7): 1001-18.
• Lord, C. (2007) ‘Contested Meanings, Democracy Assessment and the European Union’, Comparative European Politics (5)1: 70-86.
• Lord, C. (2006) ‘Democracy and the European Union, Matching Means to Standards’, Democratization 13(4): 668-684.
• Lord, C. and Magnette, P. (2004) ‘E Pluribus Unum? Creative Disagreement about Legitimacy in the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42(1): 183-202.

• Lord, Christopher James (2024). Reconciling the Interconnectedness and Autonomy of European Union Democracies Lessons from Hume and Kant. Politique européenne. ISSN 1623-6297. 83(1), s. 42–65. doi: 10.3917/poeu.083.0042. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Trondal, Jarle; Svendsen, Øyvind; Saltnes, Johanne Døhlie; Olsen, Espen Daniel Hagen; Leiren, Merethe Dotterud & Farsund, Arild Aurvåg [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Flexible Association in Foreign, Security, and Defence Policy: A case of gradually diminishing autonomy? Norway’s EU Experience and Lessons for the UK: On Autonomy and Wriggle Room. Routledge. ISSN 9781003246961. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Riddervold, Marianne; Fossum, John Erik; Lord, Christopher James; Farstad, Fay Madeleine; Farsund, Arild Aurvåg & Leiren, Merethe Dotterud [Vis alle 10 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Autonomy and Wriggle Room, Norway’s EU Experience and Lessons for the UK: On Autonomy and Wriggle Room. Routledge. ISSN 9781003246961. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Trondal, Jarle; Svendsen, Øyvind; Saltnes, Johanne Døhlie; Olsen, Espen Daniel Hagen; Leiren, Merethe Dotterud & Farsund, Arild Aurvåg [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Not Much Wriggle Room: Brexit and the Norway model, Norway’s EU Experience and Lessons for the UK: On Autonomy and Wriggle Room. Routledge. ISSN 9781003246961. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Trondal, Jarle; Svendsen, Øyvind; Saltnes, Johanne Døhlie; Olsen, Espen Daniel Hagen; Leiren, Merethe Dotterud & Farsund, Arild Aurvåg [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Global Trade and Development: The challenge of translating legal wriggle room into autonomy, Norway’s EU Experience and Lessons for the UK: On Autonomy and Wriggle Room. Routledge. ISSN 9781003246961. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Fossum, John Erik; Lord, Christopher James; Farstad, Fay Madeleine; Farsund, Arild Aurvåg; Leiren, Merethe Dotterud & Olsen, Espen Daniel Hagen [Vis alle 9 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Autonomy Under Complex Interdependence: The case of Norway and lessons for Brexit? Norway’s EU Experience and Lessons for the UK: On Autonomy and Wriggle Room. Routledge. ISSN 9781003246961. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2023). Representation without a Demos? A very European Democratic Dilemma. I Bremberg, Niklas & Norman, Ludvig (Red.), Dilemmas of European Democracy. New Perspectives on Democratic Politics in the European Union. Edinburgh University Press. ISSN 9781399511933. s. 28–55. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2023). The European Parliament and Brexit. I Lord, Christopher James & Fossum, John Erik (Red.), Handbook on the European Union and Brexit. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781839100680. s. 178–191. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James & Fossum, John Erik (2023). Introduction to the European Union and Brexit. I Lord, Christopher James & Fossum, John Erik (Red.), Handbook on the European Union and Brexit. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781839100680. s. 1–24. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2023). Conflicting Sovereignties and the Sustainability of the Brexit State. I Rone, Julia; Brack, Nathalie; Coman, Ramona & Crespy, Aamandine (Red.), Sovereignty in Conflict. Political, Constitutional and Economic Dilemmas in the EU. Palgrave Macmillan. ISSN 9783031277313. s. 23–45. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Biévre, Dirk De; Bursens, Peter; Lord, Christopher James; Trondal, Jarle & Wessel, Ramses A. (2022). Concluding Reflections: (Re)Legitimation by Institutional Design. I Lord, Christopher James; Bursens, Peter; Biévre, Dirk De; Trondal, Jarle & Wessel, Ramses A. (Red.), The Politics of Legitimation in the European Union. Legitimacy Recovered?. Routledge. ISSN 9781032101408. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2022). The many Actors of Direct and Indirect Legitimation. I Lord, Christopher James; Bursens, Peter; Biévre, Dirk De; Trondal, Jarle & Wessel, Ramses A. (Red.), The Politics of Legitimation in the European Union. Legitimacy Recovered?. Routledge. ISSN 9781032101408. s. 281–295. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Democracy at the EU level. Folly or Necessity? More work for a directly elected European Parliament? European Law Journal. ISSN 1351-5993. doi: 10.1111/eulj.12402. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  It is often argued that the European Union needs legitimation by its Member State democracies. However, there is also a reverse dependence in which Member State democracies need some kind of European Union if they are to manage externalities between themselves in ways that are needed to deliver their most fundamental obligations to their own publics to secure rights, justice, freedom from arbitrary domination and democracy itself. I argue that reverse dependence provides an additional justification for a directly elected European Parliament: namely, as an aid to national democracies in their oversight of Union decisions. The future of Europe debates should consider a directly elected Parliament as a means of connecting national democracies to the Union and not just of building representative institutions at the European level.

• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Autonomy or Domination? Two Faces of Differentiated Integration. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft. ISSN 1424-7755. 27(3), s. 546–562. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12472. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  When is differentiated integration (DI) of the European Union a source of autonomy and when is it a source of domination? Much depends on what collective goods member state democracies seek through integration. Club goods often require member state democracies to form DIs of their choice. Public goods and common resource goods may, in contrast, require limits on DI if member state democracies are to meet their own obligations to their own publics to secure rights, justice, non-domination and democracy itself. Those differences are important to understanding how European democracies should be ‘internationally ordered’ if they are to sustain internal forms of political autonomy. They also demonstrate the importance of DI to the autonomy of member state democracies in associating together beyond the state; in defining obligations within the state; and in securing the greatest autonomy of each European democracy compatible with the greatest possible autonomy of all European democracies.

• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Referendums and Democratic Theory. I Smith, Julie (Red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Referendums. Palgrave Macmillan. ISSN 9783030558031. s. 29–48. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Power, Money Knowledge and the European Central Bank. I Eriksen, Erik Oddvar (Red.), The Accountability of Expertise: Making the Un-Elected Safe for Democracy. Routledge. ISSN 9781003175490. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2021). Legitimacy Crisis in the European Union. I Brack, Nathalie & Gürkan, Seda (Red.), Theorising the Crises of the European Union. Routledge. ISSN 9780367431402. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This book examines the relevance of integration theories for studying and analsing the crisis situations faced by the EU since 2009. Ten years on from the start of the ‘age of crisis’, it critically analyses the impact of the multiple crises’ context on the EU polity and questions the utility of integration theories for grasping the peculiarities of the particular crisis under study. Bringing together prominent scholars in EU studies, the volume constitutes an essential reference book on integration theories. Its contribution is twofold. First, it provides a comparative overview of classical integration theories for studying and analysing current crisis situations the EU faces. Second, the book connects theories to current debates through an in-depth discussion of recent crises that hit European integration since 2009, with a particular focus on the financial crisis, Brexit, refugee crisis, illiberal tendencies in some member states, and the Coronavirus pandemic. This book will be of key interest to scholars and students of European integration, European Union politics, political theory, and, more broadly, to European studies.

• Lord, Christopher (2020). Lessons from the past? The 1954 Association Agreement between the UK and the European Coal and Steel Community. I Westlake, Martin (Red.), Outside the EU. Options for Britain. Agenda Publishing. ISSN 9781788213127. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Deville, Marion & Lord, Christopher (2020). Parliaments as places of discourse. I Benoît, Cyril & Rozenberg, Olivier (Red.), Handbook of Parliamentary Studies. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Legislatures. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781789906509. s. 465–478. doi: 10.4337/9781789906516.00036. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  In his great work Representative Government, John Stuart Mill (1972 [1861], p. 239) criticises those who dismiss parliaments as ‘mere talking shops or places of bavardage’. There is nothing, Mill argues, parliaments can do better than talk. Yet parliaments do more than talk. They make law. They approve budgets. They oversee. Some still make and break governments. However, time, resources, expertise and attention are limited. Parliaments may need to make trade-offs between political talk and other political work. Whole parliaments can be categorised and compared by how they make that trade-off. According to a distinction suggested by Max Weber (1994 [1917], pp. 176–7), some are said to be working parliaments, others debating parliaments. Still, any distinction between ‘working’ and ‘talking’ parliaments can only be one of degree. Talk is not distinct from the other roles and work of parliaments. It is something parliaments do in performing those other roles. This chapter asks four questions. First, how is the discursive role of parliaments best understood? Second, what are the varieties of parliamentary discourse? Third, how do academic studies evaluate the quality of parliamentary discourse? And, fourth, how does the literature explain differences in the quality of parliamentary discourse? The chapter is organised as follows. Section 26.1 discusses conceptual questions. Section 26.2 comments on how parliaments are organised for discourse. Section 26.3 discusses methods that can be used to evaluate and explain the quality of discourse in parliaments. Section 26.4 summarises some of the main results of different studies on parliamentary discourse.

• Lord, Christopher James (2020). Integration through differentiation and segmentation: the case of one member state from 1950 to Brexit (and beyond). I Fossum, John Erik & Batora, Jozef (Red.), Towards a Segmented European Political Order. The European Union's Post-crises Conundrum. Routledge. ISSN 9781138495333. s. 243–264. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2020). Integration through Differentiation and Segmentation: The Case of one Member State from 1950 to Brexit (and Beyond). I Fossum, John Erik & Batora, Jozef (Red.), Towards a Segmented European Political Order. The European Union's Post-crises Conundrum. Routledge. ISSN 9781138495333. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). How can interparliamentary cooperation contribute to the legitimacy of the EU as an international actor? I Raube, Kolja; Müftüler-Bac, Meltem & Wouters, Jan (Red.), Parliamentary Cooperation and Diplomacy in EU External Relations. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISSN 9781786438850. s. 105–119. doi: 10.4337/9781786438850.00015. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). No epistocracy without representation? The case of the European Central Bank. I Krick, Eva & Holst, Cathrine (Red.), Experts and Democratic Legitimacy. Tracing the Social Ties of Expert Bodies in Europe. Routledge. ISSN 9780367427535. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1515868. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Experts and Democratic Legitimacy challenges the technocratic reading of expert bodies, such as central banks, advisory committees and regulatory agencies. Expert contributors ask in what way expert bodies are subject to some of the key pressures in contemporary governance, such as democratisation, politicisation and expertisation. Based on empirical studies, the book traces the multiple social ties of expert bodies and refines the common perception of expert bodies as ‘de-politicised’ institutions that are detached from political interference and societal input. It further theorises the tension and reconcilability between reliable, independent expert knowledge on the one hand and the need for accountability and legitimacy in modern policy-making on the other hand. Refining the detached, de-politicised image of non-majoritarian institutions, Experts and Democratic Legitimacy will be of great interest to scholars of European studies, political and social theory, modern governance and policy-making. This book was originally published as a special issue of European Politics and Society.

• Lord, Christopher (2019). No epistocracy without representation? The case of the European Central Bank. European Politics and Society. ISSN 2374-5118. 20(1), s. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1515868. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  I argue the European Central Bank shows how mutually defining are i) the epistemic assumptions of independent central banking; ii) the powers of a central bank; iii) the political order in which it operates and iv) representative claims. I identify three ‘representative turns’ whose effects have cumulated over the history of the ECB: the first towards including representative claims in justifications for independent central banking; the second, towards a monetary dialogue between the ECB and the European Parliament; the third, towards providing the ECB with some means of discussing with parliaments how it should act in emergencies.

• Lord, Christopher (2018). The UK and European "centre formation" from 1950 to brexit. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations. ISSN 1948-9145. 10(1), s. 46–78. doi: 10.22381/GHIR10120183. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  ABSTRACT. It might be thought that Brexit is just a case of the UK getting honest with itself and its partners. On that interpretation, much British opinion never really accepted European integration. Hence, the UK should never have joined a body committed to an “ever closer Union between the peoples of Europe.” Yet, I argue, the relationship of the UK to the process of European integration has been complex and paradoxical. As a member of the EU, the UK promoted a major act of European centre formation: namely, the formation of the single market. Even where they felt unable to participate in other initiatives – such as monetary union and Schengen – British Governments settled for largely constructive forms of abstention. One thing the UK has not been is a significant constraint, or source of fragmentation in the process of European integration. That may not even change with the vote in June 2016 to leave the Union. Continued UK participation in aspects of European integration cannot be ruled out. Nor can a failed exit from the Union. On the one hand, Brexit seems both necessary and impossible: something the UK has to do and something that it cannot do. On the other hand, there seems to be no stable equilibrium in British politics for any one approach to Brexit. Yet, if it cannot “exit,” the UK may have to seek more “voice” and “loyalty” in its relationship with the Union. I make this argument by reviewing some of the history and contemporary political science of the UK’s relationship with the European Union in what, I hope, are mutually helpful ways.

• Lord, Christopher (2018). The European Parliament: a working parliament without a public? The Journal of Legislative Studies. ISSN 1357-2334. 24(1), s. 34–50. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2018.1444624. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher & Deville, Marion (2018). Le parlement: l'État, des lieux, du discours. I Thiers, Eric & Rozenberg, Olivier (Red.), Traité d'études parlementaires. Bruylant. ISSN 9782802760481. s. 637–656. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2018). Exploring the connection between knowledge and democracy. I Holst, Cathrine; Warat, Marta & Góra, Magdalena (Red.), Expertisation and Democracy in Europe. Routledge. ISSN 9781138288232. s. 17–32. doi: 10.4324/9781315268033-2. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Expertisation and Democracy in Europe provides a much-needed account of the role and re-organisation of expertise and expert knowledge in Europe and the European Union in a broad range of policy spheres, contributing to the debate triggered by the recent crises. It brings novel perspectives to debates on technocracy and our understanding of the relations between knowledge, experts and democracy. The book explores and assesses new and old linkages between knowledge, expertise and democracy, and expands and deepens the current debates by addressing questions such as: What is the role of expertise in Europe? How is knowledge of different kinds embedded in and decisive for democratic practice in contemporary democracies? How are we to assess recent transformations of the expert-citizens and government-civil society relationships from the perspective of democracy, and which paths are viable in the years to come? Finally, the book engages with and gives flesh to the notion of expertisation not only as a broad political and societal diagnosis, but also as a multidimensional and deeply contested process that enfolds in concrete practices and institutional settings.

• Lord, Christopher (2017). Segmentation, Differentiation and the Aims of European Integration. I Grimmel, Andreas (Red.), The Crisis of the European Union Challenges, Analyses, Solutions. Routledge. ISSN 9781138215641. doi: 10.4324/9781315443683-14. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Legitimacy and Democracy. I Smith, Michael; Vanhoonacker, Sophie & Hill, Christopher (Red.), International Relations and the European Union. Oxford University Press. ISSN 9780198737322. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198732624.003.0008. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  New to this Edition: A re-worked Part One examines three key frameworks for understanding the EU's role in the international system. In three new chapters, the EU is examined as sub-system of international relations, as a part of the process of international relations, and as a power in its own right. Fully updated to take account of contemporary issues including the Russia-Ukraine crisis, the migration and refugee crisis, and the UK's decision to leave the EU.

• Lord, Christopher (2017). An indirect legitimacy argument for a directly elected European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research. ISSN 0304-4130. 56(3), s. 512–528. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12204. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Can a directly elected European Parliament help deliver standards by which the European Union can be indirectly legitimated through its component national democracies? This article argues that the Union can be indirectly legitimate where it helps member state democracies meet their own obligations to their own publics. The Union can do just that by managing externalities in ways needed to secure core values of justice, democracy and freedom from arbitrary domination within member states. Yet that poses a predicament: for if any one member state has an interest in imposing negative externalities or in freeriding on positive externalities provided by another, then so may its voters and democratic institutions. The article argues a directly elected European Parliament can help manage that predicament both by identifying externalities and by ensuring their regulation meets standards of public control, political equality and justification owed to individual national democracies.

• Lord, Christopher (2017). The legitimacy of exits from the European Union. Journal of European Integration. ISSN 0703-6337. 39(5), s. 499–513. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1333117. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Justifications for extending the Union’s boundaries to include new Member States have been much discussed. Only since the Brexit referendum have justifications for shrinking the Union’s boundaries through withdrawals of Member States received the same attention. This paper uses concepts of historical responsibility to ask whether decisions Member States take together constrain the manner in which any one of them can justifiably exit the Union? It argues that much depends on how far Members States make laws together that are important to the lives of their citizens; that pre-empt their subsequent choices; and which affect their ability to manage collective action problems.

• Lord, Christopher (2017). How can Parliaments contribute to the Legitimacy of the European Semester? Parliamentary Affairs. ISSN 0031-2290. 70(4), s. 673–690. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx017. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This article develops a standard for evaluating how parliaments can contribute to the legitimacy of the European semester. It then uses that standard to identify where national parliaments may be able to oversee the semester through their relationships to their own governments and where that solution may, conversely, be insufficient. The article uses that analysis to raise four questions. Firstly, what powers over the semester should be exericed by some parliament somewhere? Secondly, how should any parliamentary participation in the semester be distributed across European, national and even sub-national parliaments? Thirdly, how far should parliaments co-operate in their responses to the semester? Fourthly, how uniform across parliaments should participation in the semester be? The final version of this research has been published in Parliamentary Affairs. © 2017 Oxford University Press

• Wilde, Pieter de & Lord, Christopher (2017). Assessing Actually-Existing Trajectories of EU Politicisation. I Wilde, Pieter de; Leupold, Anna & Schmidtke, Henning (Red.), The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance. Routledge. ISSN 9781138695214. s. 143–161. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081508. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Wilde, Pieter de & Lord, Christopher (2016). Assessing actually-existing trajectories of EU politicisation. West European Politics. ISSN 0140-2382. 39(1), s. 145–163. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1081508. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). The United Kingdom, a once and future (?) non-member state. I Eriksen, Erik Oddvar & Fossum, John Erik (Red.), The European Union's non-members: Independence under hegemony?. Routledge. ISSN 9781138922457. doi: 10.4324/9781315751030-12. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Leruth, Benjamin & Lord, Christopher (2015). Differentiated integration in the European Union: a concept, a process, a system or a theory? Journal of European Public Policy. ISSN 1350-1763. 22(6), s. 754–763. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1021196. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). Utopia or dystopia? Towards a normative analysis of differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy. ISSN 1350-1763. 22(6), s. 783–798. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1020839. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Few attempts have been made to develop a systematic normative analysis of where differentiated integration may need justification, and by what standards. This contribution argues that differentiated integration should be evaluated by a standard of how far it improves the management of externalities. That standard allows for disagreement at the European level on what values best justify choices between differential and uniform integration. Yet it is none the less a standard that member states may need to follow if they are to meet their obligations to their own publics to secure values of democracy, freedom and justice. Whether, in addition to obligations to their own publics, member states owe one another any obligations that constrain choices of differentiated integration, can then be answered by investigating how far they accord one another rights in the course of managing externalities between themselves. The example of banking union illustrates the argument. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis.

• Lord, Christopher (2014). Problems of Compound Representation in the European Union After Lisbon. I Foret, François & Rittelmeyer, Yann-Sven (Red.), The European Council and European Governance: The Commanding Heights of the EU. Routledge. ISSN 9780415857338. s. 167–185. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). On the parliamentary control of a reformed monetary union? I Fossum, John Erik & Menendez, Agustin Jose (Red.), The European Union in crises or the European Union as crises?. ARENA Centre for European Studies. ISSN 9788293137467. s. 611–637. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2013). The democratic legitimacy of codecision. Journal of European Public Policy. ISSN 1350-1763. 20(7), s. 1056–1073. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.795400. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher & Pollak, Johannes (2013). The Pitfalls of Representation as Claims-Making in the European Union. Journal of European Integration. ISSN 0703-6337. 35(5), s. 517–530. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2013.799941. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Fossum, John Erik; Lord, Christopher James; Farstad, Fay Madeleine; Farsund, Arild Aurvåg; Leiren, Merethe Dotterud & Olsen, Espen D. H. [Vis alle 10 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Norway’s EU Experience and Lessons for the UK: On Autonomy and Wriggle Room. Routledge. ISBN 9781003246961. 246 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James & Fossum, John Erik (2023). Handbook on the European Union and Brexit. Edward Elgar Publishing. ISBN 9781839100680. 541 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James; Bursens, Peter; Biévre, Dirk De; Trondal, Jarle & Wessel, Ramses A. (2022). The Politics of Legitimation in the European Union. Legitimacy Recovered? Routledge. ISBN 9781032101408. 308 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Fossum, John Erik; Lord, Christopher James & Leiren, Merethe Dotterud (2023). Books on Brexit: John Erik Fossum, Christopher Lord and Merethe Dotterud Leiren. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Haugevik, Kristin M.; Svendsen, Øyvind & Lord, Christopher James (2023). Brexit, "globale Storbritannia" og Norge. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Fossum, John Erik; Lord, Christopher James & Leiren, Merethe Dotterud (2022). Episode 5 of the podcast series ‘Good Neighbours? The UK and Europe after Brexit'. [Internet]. Soundcloud. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Norway, the EU and Brexit With John Erik Fossum, Professor of Political Science at ARENA Centre for European Studies at the University of Oslo, Merethe Dotterud Leiren, Research Director at CICERO (Center for International Climate Research) in Oslo, and Christopher Lord, Professor at ARENA Centre for European Studies at the University of Oslo. This episode discusses the pros and cons of the Norwegian model. It explores what Norway’s relationship with the EU tells us about the nature of the EU and the situation of a non-member. It also considers how Brexit has affected UK-Norway-EU relations in energy and climate change.

• Lord, Christopher James; Bursens, Peter; Biévre, Dirk De; Trondal, Jarle & Wessel, Ramses A. (2022). Introduction. I Lord, Christopher James; Bursens, Peter; Biévre, Dirk De; Trondal, Jarle & Wessel, Ramses A. (Red.), The Politics of Legitimation in the European Union. Legitimacy Recovered?. Routledge. ISSN 9781032101408. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Fossum, John Erik & Lord, Christopher James (2021). introduction on the new challenges associated with the altered context of Norway‐EU‐UK relations and some reflections on Norwegian wiggle‐room. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Autonomy or Domination? The two faces of Differentiated Integration. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Autonomy or Domination? Two Faces of Differentiated Integration. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2021). Is the European Union sufficiently democratic? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher James (2021). From Consent to Obligation. Rethinking the Indirect Legitimation of the European Union by Member State Democracies. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2020). Conflicting Sovereignties and the Brexit state. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2020). An Indirect Legitimacy Argument for Representation Beyond the State. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Money as power. Implications for ECB Independence and Epistocracy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Power, Money and Knowledge. The Case of the European Central Bank. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Conference paper on Justice, Legitimacy and Differentiated Inegration. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Presentation to the Defence Sub-Commitee of the European Parliament on accountability and the Common Security and Defence Policy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Populism and the European Parliament Elections 2019. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Interdemocracy Externalities and Collective Will Formation. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Power, Stateness and Legitimacy Crisis in the European Union. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2019). Brexit and the European political order. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2018). The Brexit debate: What role for the EES? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2018). Status of Brexit. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2018). Referendums and Democratic Theory. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Eriksen, Erik Oddvar & Lord, Christopher (2018). Brexit og EU-kunnskapen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2018). The European Parliament: A Working Parliament without a Public? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Brexit, historical responsibility and the legitimacy of withdrawals from the European Union. Are there any implications for global justice? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Crisis and Disintegration: The Paradigmatic Case of the United Kingdom. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Three Models of Legitimacy Crisis. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). On Brexit (the panel "Looking in, looking out: Brexit and Britain's European partners). Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Why there is no justification for parliaments playing a lesser role in external rather than internal decisions. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Democratic Assessment and Illiberal Democracy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Eldholm, Marit; Eriksen, Erik Oddvar & Lord, Christopher (2016). Democracy lost for non-members of the European Union. [Internet]. sciencenordic.com. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Indirect Legitimacy and the European Parliament. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Parliaments, Foreign Policy and Diplomacy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Presentation to DNB Bank on Brexit. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Debating Brexit. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Crisis and disintegration: The paradigmatic case of the United Kingdom. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Crisis, differentiation, democratic governance, monetary union and Brexit. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2016). Brexit, Historical Responsibility and the Legitimacy of Withdrawals from the European Union. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). Falling out of love With Norway? Norway in the Brexit debate. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). Democracy, Expertise and Power. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). Which Parliaments should exercise control over a changing Monetary Union? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). The United Kingdom and the European Union: Four Futures. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). Norway and Switzerland in the Brexit debate. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). The European Parliament and the Indirect Legitimacy of the European Union. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2015). Externalities and Representation Beyond the State. Lessons from the European Union. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Eriksen, Erik Oddvar; Fossum, John Erik & Lord, Christopher (2015). Is Brexit akin to Independence under Hegemony? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Book launch: The European Union's Non-Members: Independence under Hegemony

• Lord, Christopher & Eldholm, Marit (2015). Brexit and the UK’s future. [Internet]. sciencenordic.com. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Eldholm, Marit; Lord, Christopher; Eriksen, Erik Oddvar & Fossum, John Erik (2015). Britenes fire valg etter Brexit. [Internet]. Forskning.no. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). A Plague on all their Houses? Neither Majone, nor Føllesdal/Hix, and, perhaps, not even Sabel/Zeitlin. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). Social Justice, Democracy and European Integration. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). An Indirect Legitimacy argument for a Directly Elected European Parliament. Paper presented to Pademia Conference, Brussels, 12-13 June 2014. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). An Indirect Legitimacy Argument for a Directly Elected European Parliament. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). The Legitimacy of Monetary Union. New Challenges. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2014). Experiments in Democratic Auditing. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lord, Christopher (2017). Fragmentation, Segmentation and Centre Formation Some Thoughts on the UK and European Integration from 1950 to Brexit. University of Oslo/ ARENA Centre for European Studies. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  It might be thought that Brexit is just a case of the UK getting honest with itself and its partners. The UK never really accepted European integration. Hence, it should never have joined a body committed to an ‘ever closer Union between the peoples of Europe’ (even allowing for the convenient plural of the word ‘peoples’). Yet, the UK’s attitude to integration has not solely been one of aversion to European centre formation. If centre formation, segmentation into a differentially integrated Union and fragmentation are three possible trajectories of European integration, the UK contributed to a major act of European centre formation: namely, the formation of the single market. Elsewhere, British Governments settled for largely constructive forms of segmentation. One thing the UK has not been is a source of fragmentation. Of course, Brexit may change that. Brexit may be both necessary and impossible: something the British Government must do and something it cannot do. Brexit could fragment both the UK and the EU. Yet, a continuation of ‘constructive segmentation’ by other means – or even renewed centre formation – cannot be fully ruled out as possible outcomes of the Brexit referendum.

Se alle arbeider i NVA