Markus Michaelsen Bugge

• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Hansen, Teis; Tanner, Anne & Wicken, Olav (2021). Walking the talk? Innovation policy approaches to unleash the transformative potentials of the Nordic bioeconomy. Science and Public Policy. ISSN 0302-3427. 49(2), p. 324–346. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scab083. Full text in Research Archive
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Andersen, Allan Dahl & Steen, Markus (2021). The role of regional innovation systems in mission-oriented innovation policy: exploring the problem-solution space in electrification of maritime transport. European Planning Studies. ISSN 0965-4313. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1988907. Full text in Research Archive
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie; Strøm-Andersen, Nhat; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Brekke, Andreas & Prestrud, Kjersti (2021). RRI and Value Chain Collaboration for Innovations Reducing Food Waste. In Bitran, Iain; Conn, Steffen; Huizingh, K.R.E. & Torkkeli, Marko (Ed.), Proceedings on the 2021 ISPIM innovation conference : Innovating our common future. ISPIM Lappeenranta University of Technology Press. ISSN 9789523354678. Full text in Research Archive
• Bugge, Markus & Siddiq, Fazilat (2021). Empowering professionalism in mission-oriented innovation. Science and Public Policy. ISSN 0302-3427. 48(3), p. 423–437. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scab020. Full text in Research Archive
• Saidi, Trust; Thune, Taran Mari & Bugge, Markus (2020). Making ‘hidden innovation’ visible? A case study of an innovation management system in health care . Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. ISSN 0953-7325. p. 1–13. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1841156.
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Bugge, Markus; Wollscheid, Sabine & Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2020). Ready to Go? Schools? Preparedness for Teaching and Learning Within a One-to-One Program. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). ISSN 0302-9743. 12066, p. 569–580. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_47.
• Wollscheid, Sabine; Stensaker, Bjørn & Bugge, Markus (2019). Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in the Field of Education: The Dilemmas Related to Organizational Design . European Education : Issues and Studies. ISSN 1056-4934. 51(4). doi: 10.1080/10564934.2019.1619465. Full text in Research Archive
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2019). Directionality and diversity: Contending policy rationales in the transition towards the bioeconomy. In Klitkou, Antje; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Capasso, Marco (Ed.), From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies. Routledge. ISSN 978-0-429-46028-9. p. 233–252. doi: 10.3390/su9020206. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  From Waste to Value investigates how streams of organic waste and residues can be transformed into valuable products, to foster a transition towards a sustainable and circular bioeconomy. The studies are carried out within a cross-disciplinary framework, drawing on a diverse set of theoretical approaches and defining different valorisation pathways. Organic waste streams from households and industry are becoming a valuable resource in today’s economies. Substances that have long represented a cost to companies and a burden for society are now becoming an asset. Waste products, such as leftover food, forest residues and animal carcasses, can be turned into valuable products such as biomaterials, biochemicals and biopharmaceuticals. Exploiting these waste resources is challenging, however. It requires that companies develop new technologies and that public authorities introduce new regulation and governance models. This book helps policy-makers govern and regulate bio-based industries, and helps industry actors to identify and exploit new opportunities in the circular bioeconomy. Moreover, it provides important insights for all students and scholars concerned with renewable energy, sustainable development and climate change.

• Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2019). Mission-oriented innovation in urban governance: setting and solving problems in waste valorisation. In Klitkou, Antje; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Capasso, Marco (Ed.), From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies. Routledge. ISSN 978-0-429-46028-9. p. 91–106. doi: 10.4324/9780429460289-5. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  From Waste to Value investigates how streams of organic waste and residues can be transformed into valuable products, to foster a transition towards a sustainable and circular bioeconomy. The studies are carried out within a cross-disciplinary framework, drawing on a diverse set of theoretical approaches and defining different valorisation pathways. Organic waste streams from households and industry are becoming a valuable resource in today’s economies. Substances that have long represented a cost to companies and a burden for society are now becoming an asset. Waste products, such as leftover food, forest residues and animal carcasses, can be turned into valuable products such as biomaterials, biochemicals and biopharmaceuticals. Exploiting these waste resources is challenging, however. It requires that companies develop new technologies and that public authorities introduce new regulation and governance models. This book helps policy-makers govern and regulate bio-based industries, and helps industry actors to identify and exploit new opportunities in the circular bioeconomy. Moreover, it provides important insights for all students and scholars concerned with renewable energy, sustainable development and climate change.

• Bugge, Markus; Bolwig, Simon; Hansen, Teis & Tanner, Anne Nygaard (2019). Theoretical perspectives on innovation for waste valorisation in the bioeconomy. In Klitkou, Antje; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Capasso, Marco (Ed.), From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies. Routledge. ISSN 978-0-429-46028-9. p. 51–70. doi: 10.4324/9780429460289-3. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  From Waste to Value investigates how streams of organic waste and residues can be transformed into valuable products, to foster a transition towards a sustainable and circular bioeconomy. The studies are carried out within a cross-disciplinary framework, drawing on a diverse set of theoretical approaches and defining different valorisation pathways. Organic waste streams from households and industry are becoming a valuable resource in today’s economies. Substances that have long represented a cost to companies and a burden for society are now becoming an asset. Waste products, such as leftover food, forest residues and animal carcasses, can be turned into valuable products such as biomaterials, biochemicals and biopharmaceuticals. Exploiting these waste resources is challenging, however. It requires that companies develop new technologies and that public authorities introduce new regulation and governance models. This book helps policy-makers govern and regulate bio-based industries, and helps industry actors to identify and exploit new opportunities in the circular bioeconomy. Moreover, it provides important insights for all students and scholars concerned with renewable energy, sustainable development and climate change.

• Bugge, Markus; Hansen, Teis & Klitkou, Antje (2019). What is the bioeconomy? In Klitkou, Antje; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Capasso, Marco (Ed.), From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies. Routledge. ISSN 978-0-429-46028-9. p. 19–50. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  From Waste to Value investigates how streams of organic waste and residues can be transformed into valuable products, to foster a transition towards a sustainable and circular bioeconomy. The studies are carried out within a cross-disciplinary framework, drawing on a diverse set of theoretical approaches and defining different valorisation pathways. Organic waste streams from households and industry are becoming a valuable resource in today’s economies. Substances that have long represented a cost to companies and a burden for society are now becoming an asset. Waste products, such as leftover food, forest residues and animal carcasses, can be turned into valuable products such as biomaterials, biochemicals and biopharmaceuticals. Exploiting these waste resources is challenging, however. It requires that companies develop new technologies and that public authorities introduce new regulation and governance models. This book helps policy-makers govern and regulate bio-based industries, and helps industry actors to identify and exploit new opportunities in the circular bioeconomy. Moreover, it provides important insights for all students and scholars concerned with renewable energy, sustainable development and climate change.

• Bugge, Markus; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje (2018). Governance for system optimization and system change: The case of urban waste. Research Policy. ISSN 0048-7333. 48(4), p. 1076–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.013. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  This paper analyses urban waste systems to explore how local authorities can resolve challenges related to climate change, urbanization and resource depletion. The paper investigates how different public governance regimes affect local authorities’ ability to move upwards in the waste hierarchy. It identifies three different governance regimes – traditional bureaucracy, new public management and networked governance – and uses the insights from innovation in urban waste in three Norwegian city regions – Oslo, Drammen and Bergen – to illuminate how these regimes possess both strengths and weaknesses in how they affect system optimization and system change. The observed working practices signal that the issue of urban waste systems is perceived as a challenge of system optimization rather than system change. Viewing this as a challenge requiring system change would probably have ensured a stronger directionality and a broader anchoring of actors. Such an approach is likely to have arrived at a waste prevention mode earlier than the step-by-step-solutions implemented so far. The paper concludes that there is not one best governance regime, but a need to acknowledge their co-existence and carefully consider the characteristics of the respective regimes in order to arrange urban waste systems for long-term dynamic and sustainable city regions.

• Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars & Branstad, Are (2018). Governing socio-technical change: Orchestrating demand for assisted living in ageing societies. Science and Public Policy. ISSN 0302-3427. 45(4), p. 468–479. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy010. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in innovation studies towards grand challenges, and in how demand-side policy instruments can supplement traditional supply-side policy measures. To contribute to an improved understanding of how demand-side policy requires new governance responses, this article presents a case study of trialling assisted living technologies to address the grand challenge of demographic ageing. The article departs from an innovation policy framework that incorporates theorising on transformational system failures, governance modes, and policy mixes. This framework serves as an entry point to explore how different modes of governance condition the ways in which demand for assisted living in healthcare is orchestrated across multiple stakeholders. The case study is embedded in a wider system shift from a reactive to a proactive system of healthcare provision, enabling the elderly to live independently at home longer and thus avoiding or postponing institutionalised care.

• Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars; Marques, Pedro & Morgan, Kevin (2017). Governing system innovation: assisted living experiments in the UK and Norway. European Planning Studies. ISSN 0965-4313. 25(12), p. 2138–2156. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1349078. Show summary

  Debates on how to address societal challenges have moved to the forefront of academic and policy concerns. Of particular importance is the growing awareness that to deal with issues such as ageing, it will be necessary to implement concerted efforts on technological, social, institutional or political fronts. Drawing on a number of theoretical perspectives – including socio-technical transitions and embedded state theory – the aim of this paper is to identify and understand different approaches to the governance of such system innovations by comparing state responses to assisted living in two contrasting national systems of care, namely that of the UK and Norway. Its findings highlight that state-supported and funded experimentation projects have been instrumental in designing and implementing system innovation: through their emphasis on co-design and co-creation, these projects demonstrated the value of early implementation pilots to explore the ‘fit’ between novel technologies and prevailing practices and institutional structures in national systems of care. Still, competition, biases or conflicting interests should not be ignored between well-established agents and institutions and experimental solutions whose efficacy remains relatively untested and which involve a combination of new technical, social, organizational and institutional solutions.

• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2017). Directionality across diversity: governing contending policy rationales in the transition towards the bioeconomy. Sustainability. ISSN 2071-1050. 9(2). doi: 10.3390/su9020206. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Although the bioeconomy has been embraced by many governments around the world as a way of responding to the grand challenge of climate change, it remains unclear what the bioeconomy is and how it can contribute to achieving these broad policy objectives. The aim of this paper is to improve our understanding of whether, and how, the bioeconomy includes contending rationales for governance and policy-making. In order to do this, we apply a typology of three bioeconomy visions onto the policy discourse on the bioeconomy. These visions are (1) a bio-technology vision; (2) a bio-resource vision; and (3) a bio-ecology vision. Based on a discourse analysis of 41 submissions to a public hearing on the development of a bioeconomy strategy in Norway, the paper explores the actors involved in shaping the new bioeconomy and analyses their positions on this emerging field. The paper finds that it is possible to categorise the consultative inputs into these three visions, and also that the bio-resource vision is predominant, which reflects the structure of the national economy. Moreover, the paper reflects upon how the contending visions observed imply negotiations and power struggles, which may hamper directionality in the current socio-technical transition.

• Bugge, Markus & Thune, Taran Mari (2016). Situated Knowledge Spillovers: A Case Study of Industry Specificity in Urban Knowledge Sourcing. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. ISSN 0435-3684. 98(3), p. 255–270. doi: 10.1111/geob.12097.
• Bugge, Markus; Hansen, Teis & Klitkou, Antje (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability. ISSN 2071-1050. 8:691(7). doi: 10.3390/su8070691. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  The notion of the bioeconomy has gained importance in both research and policy debates over the last decade, and is frequently argued to be a key part of the solution to multiple grand challenges. Despite this, there seems to be little consensus concerning what bioeconomy actually implies. Consequently, this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of what the notion of bioeconomy means by exploring the origins, uptake, and contents of the term “bioeconomy” in the academic literature. Firstly, we perform a bibliometric analysis that highlights that the bioeconomy research community is still rather fragmented and distributed across many different fields of science, even if natural and engineering sciences take up the most central role. Secondly, we carry out a literature review that identifies three visions of the bioeconomy. The bio-technology vision emphasises the importance of bio-technology research and application and commercialisation of bio-technology in different sectors of the economy. The bio-resource vision focuses on processing and upgrading of biological raw materials, as well as on the establishment of new value chains. Finally, the bio-ecology vision highlights sustainability and ecological processes that optimise the use of energy and nutrients, promote biodiversity, and avoid monocultures and soil degradation.

• Coenen, Lars; Asheim, Bjørn Terje; Bugge, Markus & Herstad, Sverre Johan (2016). Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy. ISSN 0263-774X. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16646583. Full text in Research Archive
• Bugge, Markus & Bloch, Carter (2016). Between bricolage and breakthroughs—framing the many faces of public sector innovation. Public Money & Management. ISSN 0954-0962. 36(4), p. 281–288. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1162599.
• Bugge, Markus & Øiestad, Sara (2015). The Micro-foundations of Regional Branching—the Case of Digitization of Publishing. European Planning Studies. ISSN 0965-4313. 23(4), p. 764–784. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.970131. Full text in Research Archive
• Bugge, Markus & Øiestad, Sara (2014). Digitisation of publishing: Exploration based on existing business models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ISSN 0040-1625. 83(1), p. 54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.010. Show summary

  Like other creative industries, the book publishing industry is currently experiencing a shift from analogue to digital technologies and formats. This shift challenges existing business models and impels firms to re-examine their product portfolios and core competencies. Through a qualitative case study of the three largest publishing houses in Norway, Aschehoug, Cappelen Damm and Gyldendal, this paper investigates how digitisation affects business models in the book publishing industry. The paper argues that the publishing houses are two-faced in meeting new digital technologies. The industry has come relatively far in developing industry standards and joint distribution systems. However, the functionality and user experience of digital products is still poor, prices are still high, and the share of Norwegian language digital titles is low. In addition, knowledge acquisition from consumers and lead users are suboptimal. Due to divergence in goals, formats and markets, there is a lack of a common dominant design for digital publishing. This represents a substantial uncertainty for the publishers, who are moving step-by-step into the new digital era and whose exploration of new market opportunities and alternative business models remains anchored in traditional and analogue business models. The paper also discusses how current institutions contribute to preserve the analogue publishing regime.

• Bloch, Carter & Bugge, Markus (2013). Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. ISSN 0954-349X. 27, p. 133–145. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008. Show summary

  While there is growing awareness that much innovation currently takes place in the publicsector, it is also recognised that more systematic efforts to promote innovation are neededto address the economic and societal challenges that public sectors face. However, there is alack of a common understanding of what public sector innovation is and a lack of a measure-ment framework that can shed light on innovation processes in public sector organisations.Based on insights generated in a recent Nordic pilot study, this paper seeks to contribute tofill this gap. The paper discusses how public sector innovation can be captured and to whatextent measurement can be based on frameworks originally developed in a private sectorcontext. While there are important differences between the public and the private sectorthat should be reflected in a measurement framework, there is also considerable commonground that can be drawn upon.

• Bugge, Markus & Skålholt, Asgeir (2013). Smart velferd: Styringsparadigmer for innovasjon i kommunene. In Ringholm, Toril M; Teigen, Håvard & Aarsæther, Nils (Ed.), Innovative kommuner. Cappelen Damm Akademisk. ISSN 978-82-02-41182-4. p. 53–70.

View all works in Cristin

• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie; Strøm-Andersen, Nhat; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Brekke, Andreas & Prestrud, Kjersti (2022). When urgent challenges demand the time to collaborate: RRI and Value Chain Collaboration for Innovations Reducing Food Waste.
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Berg, Richard L. & Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard (2021). Technology transfer for transformative change? Systemic barriers ti innovation in the global south.
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen (2021). Verdenskafé om matsvinn.
• Strøm-Andersen, Nhat; Szulecka, Julia & Bugge, Markus Michaelsen (2021). A systemic negligence? The transition toward food sustainability and the case of food waste.
• Daus, Stephan; Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia; Siddiq, Fazilat; Hammer Smedsrud, Jørgen; Håland, Tine Weise & Bugge, Markus Michaelsen (2021). Hvordan fungerer Dragonbox Skole på elevenes matematikkferdigheter og lærelyst?
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie; Strøm-Andersen, Nhat; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Brekke, Andreas & Prestrud, Kjersti (2021). RRI and Value Chain Collaboration for Innovations Reducing Food Waste.
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie; Strøm-Andersen, Nhat; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Brekke, Andreas & Prestrud, Kjersti (2021). RRI and Value Chain Collaboration for Innovations Reducing Food Waste.
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen & Normann, Håkon Endresen (2021). Nærsynt om «mission»-økonomi. Dagens næringsliv. ISSN 0803-9372.
• Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia; Siddiq, Fazilat; Hammer Smedsrud, Jørgen; Bugge, Markus & Daus, Stephan (2021). Innovativ matematikkundervisning på barnetrinnet førte til positive resultater. Show summary

  Matematikkundervisning på barnetrinnet med læreverket Dragonbox Skole har så langt vært en suksess. Implementeringen har hatt god oppslutning med engasjerte lærere. Elevene som brukte læreverket, gjorde det bedre på matematikkprøver enn elever som ikke brukte det. Lærernes erfaringer med profesjonsutvikling, implementering av læreverket og tilpasset opplæring har blitt undersøkt.

• Andersen, Allan Dahl; Bugge, Markus; Capasso, Marco; Jolly, Suyash; Klitkou, Antje & Sotarauta, Markku [Show all 8 contributors for this article] (2021). Green growth in Nordic regions: Eight case studies.
• Bugge, Markus (2020). (How) do we enable transformative innovation in the public sector?
• Bugge, Markus (2020). Forutsetninger for en grønn og innovativ avfallslogistikk .
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Bugge, Markus & Wennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2020). Organization of teaching and learning with 1:1 digital devices .
• Bugge, Markus; Andersen, Allan Dahl & Steen, Markus (2020). Multi-scalar directionality in mission-oriented innovation policies - A ferrytale from green maritime.
• Steen, Markus; Hansen, Teis; Bugge, Markus; Finne, Håkon & Ullern, Eli Fyhn (2020). Policy mixes for regional green growth.
• Røste, Rannveig & Bugge, Markus (2019). "Mission-oriented innovation policy on the ground: co-evolving in the interplay of public, private and civic actors".
• Szulecka, Julia; Bugge, Markus & Scordato, Lisa (2019). Bioøkonomi - men hvordan? Koordineringsutfordringer.
• Bugge, Markus; Hatløy, Anne; Halvorsen, Tor; Kebede, Tewodros Aragie; Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard & Van den Bergh, Graziella (2019). The need for demand and local anchoring of innovations.
• Bugge, Markus; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje (2019). Er offentlig sektor rigget for det grønne skiftet? Stat og styring. ISSN 0803-0103. 29(3), p. 20–23. Show summary

  Silotenkning og manglende koordinering på tvers av offentlig og privat sektor er anerkjente svakheter ved et byråkratisk styringsregime. Disse svakhetene kan hindre Oslo kommune i å oppnå sine ambisiøse miljøpolitiske mål.

• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Vennerød, Frida Felicia & Bugge, Markus (2019). Hvorfor skal vi ha nettbrett i skolen? Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.). ISSN 0804-3116.
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Multi-level directionality in mission-oriented innovation - A ferrytale from green maritime .
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Organisering for innovasjon - Er offentlig sektor rigget for det grønne skiftet?
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Szulecka, Julia (2019). Koordineringsutfordringer i politikken for bioøkonomien.
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Innovasjon i avfallshåndtering - Resirkulering eller forebygging?
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Understanding the Bioeconomy.
• Bugge, Markus (2018). Future studies of policies for research and innovation.
• Bugge, Markus; Dybdahl, Linn Meidell & Szulecka, Julia (2018). NIFU Insight 2018:1. Recycling or prevention of waste?Addressing the food waste challenge in the right end (SusValueWaste Policy Brief no. 2).
• Røste, Rannveig; Bugge, Markus & Dybdahl, Linn Meidell (2018). Grand challenges on the ground: Exploring governance dynamics in sustainability transitions.
• Bugge, Markus (2018). Innovation in an SDG context. Sustainable innovations: Drivers, dilemmas and goals.
• Gregg, Jay Sterling; Happel, Maaike Karlijn; Bolwig, Simon; Bugge, Markus; Tanner, Anne & Klitkou, Antje (2018). The value chain for valorisation of organic waste in promotion of a circular bioeconomy: A literature review.
• Bugge, Markus (2017). Hvorfor vokser Norge? Paneldebatt om norsk verdiskapning og innovasjon. [Internet]. Deloitte.
• Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2017). Privat eller offentlig søppeldrift? Klassekampen. ISSN 0805-3839. p. 24–24.
• Normann, Håkon Endresen & Bugge, Markus (2017). Politikk uten prioriteringer. Forskningspolitikk. ISSN 0333-0273. 40(2), p. 4–5.
• Bugge, Markus (2017). Hvordan kan bioøkonomien forstås som et systemskift? Bioøkonomien i et bredere perspektiv .
• Klitkou, Antje; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Action space in transition to sustainable urban waste management.
• Bugge, Markus (2016). Forskning og Innovasjon.
• Bugge, Markus; Klitkou, Antje & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Transition to sustainable urban waste management.
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Deconstructing the policy discourse: Contending visions of the bio-based economy.
• Klitkou, Antje; Bugge, Markus & Hansen, Teis (2016). Competing visions for the transition to the bioeconomy.
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Governance in transition: directionality and heterogeneity towards a bioeconomy.
• Klitkou, Antje; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Action space in transition to sustainable urban waste management.
• Bugge, Markus & Skogli, Erland (2016). Spredning av innovative offentlige anskaffelser i norske kommuner.
• Bugge, Markus (2016). From Grand Challenges to Daily Practice: The policy conditions for transformational change.
• Bugge, Markus & Smith, Keith (2016). Facing the Grand Challenges: Health and Ageing, Climate and Energy.
• Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars & Branstad, Are (2015). A co-evolutionary approach to transformative change in health care – The case of active ageing .
• Bugge, Markus & Skogli, Erland (2015). Hvordan fremme innovasjon i kommunale anskaffelser?
• Bugge, Markus (2015). A co-evolutionary approach to transformative change in health care – The case of active ageing.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). A co-evolutionary approach to transformative change in health care – The case of active ageing.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). Velferdsteknologi, utvikling og samhandling - Relasjon mellom bruker, kommune og leverandør.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). Måling av forskningens samfunnseffekter. Forskningspolitikk. ISSN 0333-0273. 38(2).
• Bugge, Markus (2015). Kunnskapens begrensninger.
• Bugge, Markus & Seland, Idunn (2015). Å måle seg inn i et hjørne. Dagsavisen. ISSN 1503-2892. p. 6–6.
• Bugge, Markus (2014). Kunnskapens begrensninger. Stat og styring. ISSN 0803-0103. p. 10–13.
• Bugge, Markus; Solberg, Espen & Wilhelmsen, Lars (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013 (EPSIS). In Solberg, Espen & Wendt, Kaja Kathrine (Ed.), Det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet - statistikk og indikatorer 2013. Norges forskningsråd. ISSN 978821203238-5. p. 29–29.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Hvordan orkestrere kunnskap for en innovativ Osloregion?
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Refleksjoner rundt forskerrollen.
• Bugge, Markus; Herstad, Sverre Johan; Coenen, Lars & Asheim, Bjørn Terje (2013). What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Re-considering regional innovation policy.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Innovasjon i offentlige organisasjoner.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Re-cycling knowledge: How do modern societies and economies evolve through technological change and innovation?
• Bloch, Carter & Bugge, Markus (2012). Public sector innovation - from theory to measurement.
• Bugge, Markus & Skålholt, Asgeir (2012). Co-creation for Public Sector Innovation.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Digitalisering av reklamebransjen.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Innovasjon i offentlige organisasjoner.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Fra budskap til tjeneste.
• Herstad, Sverre Johan; Asheim, Bjørn Terje; Bugge, Markus & Coenen, Lars (2012). What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring To The Policy Table? Reconceptualising regional innovation systems.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Innovasjon i offentlig sektor satt i kontekst.
• Foyn, Frank; Wilhelmsen, Lars & Bugge, Markus (2011). Innovasjon i offentlig sektor - kunnskapsgrunnlaget for en mer effektiv og strategisk offentlig sektor i Norden. In Wendt, Kaja Kathrine (Eds.), Det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet - statistikk og indikatorer 2011. Norges forskningsråd. ISSN 978-82-12-02965-1. p. 129–130. Show summary

  Rapporten om det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet er et resultat av et samarbeid mellom NIFU, Statistisk sentralbyrå (SSB) og Norges forskningsråd, der NIFU har det redaksjonelle hovedansvaret. Indikatorrapporten 2011 er den niende utgaven i en serie som startet i 1997 med årlige utgivelser fra 2009.

• Finne, Håkon; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Hansen, Teis; Jolly, Suyash; Steen, Markus & Suvinen, Nina (2021). Regional policies for green growth. Nordic experiences. SINTEF Digital, Teknologiledelse. ISSN 978-82-14-07654-7. Full text in Research Archive Show summary

  Regional councils find many roads to green growth The report discusses policies for green growth of a number of regional (or county) councils in Finland, Norway, and Sweden. These policies, which vary in scope, in ambition, and in degree of place-basedness, provide fertile meeting grounds for policy traditions for decarbonization of public services through public procurement and for innovation oriented growth initiatives. They mostly succeed maneuvering within constraints given by existing industrial structure and by inconsistencies in national and international policies, by leaning on second generation innovation system capabilities (correcting for market and systems failures) built over time. The more experimental initiatives involving a stronger directionality seem to benefit from place-based leadership in transforming both institutional settings and socio-cognitive orientations towards what it means to be green and to grow at the same time. Towards the end, we also discuss some challenges ahead, given that all regions are not equally well equipped for these transitions as the ones in our sample, and also given that the policy cases in our sample only to a smaller degree have addressed the heavier systemic restructurings required for successful transitions towards sustainability. Coordinated monitoring is recommended for systematic learning.

• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Bugge, Markus & Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2019). Digital læring i askerskolen : Sluttrapport fra følgeforskning. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning NIFU. ISSN 978-82-327-0440-8.
• Andersen, Allan Dahl; Bugge, Markus; Capasso, Marco; Jolly, Suyash; Klitkou, Antje & Sotarauta, Markku [Show all 8 contributors for this article] (2019). Green growth in Nordic regions : Eight case studies . Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning NIFU. ISSN 978-82-327-0389-0.
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Bugge, Markus & Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2018). Digital læring i askerskolen : Midtveisrapport fra følgeforskning. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning NIFU . ISSN 978-82-327-0362-3. Show summary

  I perioden 2017-2019 gjennomfører Asker kommune prosjektet «Digital læring i askerskolen». Prosjektet omfatter implementering av 1:1 dekning av Chromebooks for alle kommunens skoler og herunder et større kompetanseløft for alle kommunens lærere. NIFU skal følge prosjektet med et følgeforskningsdesign. Datagrunnlaget omfatter skoleeier, skoleledelse, lærere og elever. Denne midtveisrapporten gir et bilde av satsingens første halvannet år.

• Siddiq, Fazilat; Bugge, Markus; Ulriksen, Robin & Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard (2017). Matematikk på nye måter : Erfaringer fra pilotering av Dragonbox ved 10 skoler i Skedsmo kommune. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning NIFU . ISSN 978-82-327-0284-8. Show summary

  Denne rapporten presenterer resultatene fra følgeevalueringen av Dragonbox – et heldigitalt læreverk for å fremme tallforståelse i begynneropplæringen i pilotåret 2016/2017. Formålet har vært å belyse flere sider ved implementeringen av læreverket, slik som organiseringen av uttestingen, opplevelsen av implementeringen hos de involverte aktørene, samt brukertilfredshet og erfaringer med læreverket.

• Bugge, Markus; Wollscheid, Sabine & Stensaker, Bjørn (2016). Evaluering av Kunnskapssenter for utdanning. Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning NIFU. ISSN 978-82-327-0188-9.
• Sivertsen, Gunnar; Piro, Fredrik Niclas; Bugge, Markus; Fevolden, Arne Martin; Solberg, Espen & Wiig, Ole (2014). Monitoreringssystem for forskning og innovasjon innen helse og omsorg: Et forprosjekt for å undersøke mulighetene. NIFU Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning. ISSN 1894-8200.
• Asheim, Bjørn Terje; Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars & Herstad, Sverre Johan (2013). What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring To The Policy Table? Reconceptualising regional innovation systems. Circle, Lunds universitet.
• Bugge, Markus; Solberg, Espen; Fridholm, Tobias & Sivertsen, Gunnar (2013). Kunnskap i system: En kartlegging av kunnskapsfunksjonen på det arbeids- og velferdspolitiske området i Sverige, Danmark og Canada. NIFU Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning. ISSN 978-82-7218-968-5.
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Mortensen, Peter S. & Bloch, Carter (2011). Measuring Public Innovation in Nordic Countries: Report on the Nordic Pilot studies - Analyses of methodelogy and results. NIFU Nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning. ISSN 978-82-7218-794-0.

View all works in Cristin