Andreas Eriksen

Postdoktor - ARENA Senter for europaforskning

English version of this page

E-post andreas.eriksen@arena.uio.no

Telefon +47-22858865

Brukernavn

Besøksadresse Sognsveien 68 3. etasje 0855 Oslo

Postadresse Postboks 1143 Blindern 0318 OSLO

Last ned visittkort

Faglige interesser

Andreas Eriksens interesser er filosofiske studier av moralsk ansvar, profesjonell dømmekraft og standarder for offentlig fornuft. Hans arbeid inkluderer artikler om betydningen av rollemoral, sammenhengen mellom vilje og profesjonell forståelse, samt begrunnelser for velferdspolitikk.

Bakgrunn

Eriksen har en bachelorgrad fra Universitetet i Tromsø og en mastergrad fra Universitetet i Oslo. Han har vært gjesteforsker ved Universitetet i Konstanz. Han tok sin doktorgrad i profesjonsstudier ved Høgskolen i Oslo og Akershus. Avhandlingen “Taking Roles Seriously. On Professional Duty and Virtue” undersøkte forholdet mellom allmennmoral og profesjonsetikk. Han var deretter forsker på prosjektet ”Mellom inntektssikring og aktivering” (TREfF-2) ved Senter for profesjonsstudier.

Prosjekt

Eriksen arbeider på et postdoktorprosjekt kalt “The Democratic Value of Experts.” Prosjektet skal gi et normativt rammeverk for ekspertvurderinger. Arbeidet er en del av ARENA-prosjektet “Democracy and Expert Rule: The Quest for Reflexive Legitimacy” (REFLEX).

Emneord: Legitimitet, Rollemoral, Normativ kognitivisme, Profesjonell dømmekraft, Offentlig fornuft

Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Conflicting duties and restitution of the trusting relationship. Journal of Medical Ethics. ISSN 0306-6800. 44(11), s 1- 6 . doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104682 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag
It is often claimed that medical professionals are subject to conflicting duties in their role morality. Some hold that the overridden duty taints the professional and generates a patient claim to a form of moral compensation. This paper challenges such a ‘compensation view’ of conflict and argues that it misleadingly makes the role morality into a personal contract between professional and patient. Two competing views are therefore considered. The ‘unity view’ argues that there are no real conflicts between professional duties. Hence, there can be no residual duties that are impossible to discharge and no special claim on the part of the patient. It is argued that this fails because the institutional nature of the role morality requires us to accept possibility of conflict. The paper articulates and defends a third view, where conflict triggers a professional duty of restitution. This duty is not a matter of making amends for a previous wrong, but rather a matter of rebuilding a trusting relationship that has been damaged due to blameless circumstances.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Reclaiming Responsibility: The Case of Welfare-to-Work Policy. Journal of Social Policy. ISSN 0047-2794. s 1- 18 . doi: 10.1017/S0047279418000612
Eriksen, Andreas & Molander, Anders (2018). Welfare reform and public justification. Policy Studies. ISSN 0144-2872. s 1- 20 . doi: 10.1080/01442872.2018.1538487
Eriksen, Andreas (2015). Beyond Professional Duty: Does Supererogation Belong to the Morality of Roles?. International Journal of Applied Philosophy. ISSN 0739-098X. 29(1) . doi: 10.5840/ijap201561842
Eriksen, Andreas (2015). Should eudaimonia structure professional virtue?. Journal of Philosophy of Education. ISSN 0309-8249. 50(4), s 605- 618 . doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12162
Eriksen, Andreas (2015). The authority of professional roles. Journal of social philosophy. ISSN 0047-2786. 46(3), s 373- 391 . doi: 10.1111/josp.12103 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
Eriksen, Andreas (2015). What is professional integrity?. Etikk i praksis. ISSN 1890-3991. 9(2), s 3- 17 . doi: 10.5324/eip.v9i2.1836 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
Eriksen, Andreas (2011). Hva er moralsk forpliktelse? En drøfting av tre forslag, I: Hans Erik Næss & Thomas Hylland Eriksen (red.), Kulturell kompleksitet i det nye Norge. Unipub forlag. ISBN 9788274775282. Kapittel 15. s 235 - 247

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

Eriksen, Andreas (2019). Agency Accountability: Management of Expectations or Answerability to Mandate?.
Eriksen, Andreas (2019). The Accountability of Independent Agencies.
Eriksen, Andreas & Katsaitis, Alexander (2019). Accountability through Mutual Attunement.
Eriksen, Andreas & Katsaitis, Alexander (2019). Accountability through Mutual Attunement: Parliamentary Hearings & Agency Oversight in the European Union.
Katsaitis, Alexander & Eriksen, Andreas (2019). Accountability and the Forging of Agency Ends: The European Security and Markets Authority in the European Parliament’s Committee Hearings.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Blog: “Accountability overload”: Too much of a good thing?.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Blog: Conflicts of duty: What do they mean?.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Blog: Have Welfare-to-Work Reforms Promoted Citizen Responsibility?.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Legitimate Agency Reasoning. ARENA Working Papers. 1. Vis sammendrag
The paper seeks to develop a framework for assessing the legitimacy reasoning in regulatory agencies. It starts by engaging critically with two prominent models. The first model sees the legitimacy of judgments as resting exclusively on their merits as sources of technical knowledge. By contrast, the second model acknowledges room for evaluative judgment, but construes this as a matter of specifying given policy ends. The paper argues that these models fail to capture how agency judgments should be governed by standards beyond both empirical science and ordinary politics. The proposal is to view the standards as flowing from the principle of reciprocity, familiar from public reason theory. The model advocated here highlights how responsiveness to policy ends is structured by a mandate and how fidelity to mandate requires ‘political literacy’, which is a distinct mode of disciplining evaluative judgments.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). Political literacy. The concept and its application to the unelected..
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). The Facts of Agency Accountability.
Eriksen, Andreas (2018). The Political Literacy of Experts.
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Bokanmeldelse: New Contractualism in European Welfare State Policies. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. ISSN 0040-716X. 58(3), s 357- 360 . doi: 10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2017-03-08
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Conflicting Professional Duties and Blameworthiness.
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Detaljstyring av moralfilosofien?. Morgenbladet. ISSN 0805-3847.
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Legitimate Agency Reasoning.
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Moral philosophers and virtue: What is wrong with being bad? (Blog).
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Professional ethics in the age of AI: Upgrading to v3.0 (Blog).
Eriksen, Andreas (2017). Reclaiming Responsibility.
Eriksen, Andreas (2016). Lykkelig som engasjert i jobben.
Eriksen, Andreas (2016). Lærerens dedikasjon og rolleforståelse. Bedre Skole. ISSN 0802-183X. (2), s 72- 76
Eriksen, Andreas (2016). Profesjonsroller og lykke.
Eriksen, Andreas (2016). Taking Roles Seriously. On Professional Duty and Virtue..
Eriksen, Andreas & Lassen, Kjersti (2016, 02. mars). Derfor er noen lykkeligere på jobb. [Internett]. forskning.no.
Eriksen, Andreas (2014). A. Eriksen svarer:. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. 134(8), s 808- 809 . doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0453
Eriksen, Andreas (2014). Tvilsom begrunnelse for reservasjonsmulighet. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. ISSN 0029-2001. (5) . doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.13.1512
Eriksen, Andreas (2013, 25. oktober). Om reservasjonsrett. [Radio]. NRK P1 Norgesglasset.
Eriksen, Andreas (2013). Profesjonsroller og moralsk divergens.
Eriksen, Andreas (2013). Vi taper offentlig begrunnelse. Vårt land. ISSN 0805-5424.
Eriksen, Andreas (2012). The Force of Professional Obligations.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

Publisert 1. sep. 2017 11:58 - Sist endret 27. okt. 2017 13:06