Bård Lahn

Asdal, Kristin & Lahn, Bård (2024). Governing as valuing: Assetization and the making of the Norwegian oil fund. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. doi: 10.1177/0308518X241260588.

Lahn, Bård (2023). Klimapolitikk i oljestaten: Robust folkestyre eller sementerte næringsinteresser? Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift. doi: 10.18261/nost.7.4-5.5.

Lahn, Bård (2021). Changing climate change: The carbon budget and the modifying-work of the IPCC. Social Studies of Science. doi: 10.1177/0306312720941933.

Lahn, Bård & Sundqvist, Göran (2017). Science as a 'fixed point'? Quantification and boundary objects in international climate politics. Environmental Science & Policy. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.001.

Lahn, Bård (2013). Klimaspillet: En fortelling fra innsiden av FNs klimatoppmøter. Oslo: Flamme Forlag.

• Lahn, Bård; Sognnæs, Ida Andrea Braathen & Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. (2025). Analysing the use of emissions scenarios in practice. npj Climate Action. 4(1). doi: 10.1038/s44168-025-00320-8. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Emissions scenarios generated by Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) are an important element in the IPCC’s relevance for climate action, but little attention has been given to how scenarios are used in practice. This article draws on insights from Science and Technology Studies (STS) to develop a framework for analysing scenario use and provides an exploratory case study of scenario users in government and energy-related companies in Norway. We find that scenarios are used for contrasting purposes but are often actively interpreted and processed by informed users who are aware of different scenarios’ strengths, limitations and uncertainties. Institutional ties, trust, and alignment in problem definition play important roles when organisations choose which scenarios to work with, and the political implications of scenario choice are frequently acknowledged. We conclude that more attention should be paid to the actual use of scenarios in discussions about the IPCC’s policy relevance.

• Farstad, Fay Madeleine; Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård (2025). For Better or for Worse: A Break with Norway's Consensual Climate Tradition? I Tobin, Paul; Paterson, Matthew & VanDeveer, Stacy D. (Red.), Stability and Politicization in Climate Governance. Cambridge University Press. ISSN 9781009352451. s. 163–175. doi: 10.1017/9781009352444.014. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Norway is an active player in international climate politics, with strong consensus on the issue underpinned by cross-party Climate Settlements. Despite this, Norway has only marginally reduced its domestic greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, attempts to establish a new Climate Settlement in 2021 failed. Does this failure constitute a break with Norway’s consensual climate tradition, and is this good or bad news for climate policy? In this chapter, we investigate whether and to what extent the consensus characterizing the 2000s and 2010s contributed to climate policy development or stasis. Focusing on two key sectors – petroleum and transport – we find that key Norwegian climate policies have developed through a dynamic tension of depoliticization and repoliticization over time, with mixed effects. We identify reasons for depoliticization and repoliticization and argue that it is useful to embrace agnosticism in the debate over politicization versus policy stability, instead exploring this on an empirical and contextual basis. Moreover, we uncover a dynamic of politicization in one policy area affecting policy development in another, arguing that such spillover effects warrant analytical attention.

• Asdal, Kristin & Lahn, Bård (2024). Governing as valuing: Assetization and the making of the Norwegian oil fund. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. ISSN 0308-518X. doi: 10.1177/0308518X241260588. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Recent scholarship has highlighted ‘assetization’ as an increasingly prevalent process in which valuation practices from financial economics are imposed on new aspects of society. This paper analyses the establishment of the Norwegian ‘oil fund’ – currently the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund – as the outcome of such a process. It traces the shift in the Norwegian government’s valuation arrangements from valuing oil as ‘activity’ in the 1970s towards valuing oil as a ‘national asset’ from the mid-1980s, and shows how this shift happened through close exchanges between economic expertise and governmental procedures. The paper contributes to understanding assetization as a mode of governing by showing both how it happens through governmental tools and practices and how it can have direct material consequences. In the case of Norwegian oil, the introduction of new tools of valuation made the Norwegian government manage the oil resource in a new way, and led to a re-timing of the pace of its extraction. The outcome was speeding up the conversion of oil into financial holdings, and the establishment of the ‘oil fund’ as a new infrastructure for handling oil as a national asset.

• Asayama, Shinichiro; Pryck, Kari de; Beck, Silke; Cointe, Béatrice; Edwards, Paul N. & Guillemot, Hélène [Vis alle 30 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2023). Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC. Nature Climate Change. ISSN 1758-678X. 13, s. 877–880. doi: 10.1038/s41558-023-01780-8. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2023). Boundary Objects. I Pryck, Kari de & Hulme, Mike (Red.), A Critical Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISSN 9781316514276. s. 225–233. doi: 10.1017/9781009082099. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). Klimapolitikk i oljestaten: Robust folkestyre eller sementerte næringsinteresser? Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift. 7(4-5), s. 63–75. doi: 10.18261/nost.7.4-5.5. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Makt- og demokratiutredningen konkluderte for 20 år siden med at det norske folkestyret er under press som følge av blant annet rettsliggjøring, markedsretting og overnasjonal styring. Samtidig påpekte utredningen at Norge er blitt en «oljestat» og problematiserte hva det betyr for forventningene til statens rolle. Mindre problematisert var hva «oljestaten» betyr for utformingen av norsk klima- og miljøpolitikk og håndteringen av det utredningen kalte Norges «klimadilemma». 20 år etter kan vi konstatere at olje og klima har blitt en stadig mer sentral konfliktlinje i norsk politikk, og at klimapolitiske hensyn i økende grad utfordrer oljestaten. Samtidig har den faktiske forvaltningen av oljeressursene endret seg lite, og norsk olje- og gassutvinning er langt høyere i dag enn man forventet for 20 år siden. Hva forteller dette oss om den demokratiske styringen av klimapolitikk og oljeressurser i Norge? For å diskutere dette spørsmålet gjennomgår artikkelen hvordan klimapolitiske krav og målsettinger har utfordret norsk oljepolitikk i løpet av de siste 20 årene, og hvilke politiske endringer disse utfordringene har medført. Gjennomgangen viser at oljepolitikken har blitt sterkt politisert som følge av nye klimakrav, og at dette har gitt økt debatt om den demokratiske styringen av oljeressursene. Flere av metodene som har blitt brukt for å utfordre oljestaten er imidlertid knyttet til nettopp de prosessene som Makt- og demokratiutredningen assosierer med folkestyrets forvitring – overnasjonal styring, markedsretting og rettsliggjøring. Dette åpner for å nyansere Makt- og demokratiutredningens advarsler og å framheve verdien av politisering for aktiv demokratisk debatt og stillingtaken i spørsmål som berører sterke, etablerte næringsinteresser.

• Smith, Ida Dokk; Øverland, Indra & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). Klimaklubbkvaler. Internasjonal Politikk. ISSN 0020-577X. 80(1), s. 184–196. doi: 10.23865/intpol.v80.3765. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Norges internasjonale klimapolitikk har alltid hatt som målsetting å oppnå et mest mulig enhetlig globalt klimaregime. Parisavtalen reflekterer i stedet – og bidrar til å forsterke – et fragmentert klimaregime med et mylder av nye samarbeidsformer mellom land. I denne artikkelen trekker vi frem tre trender som preger det nye klimaregimet: et skifte fra klima- til grønn industripolitikk; økende spenning mellom klima- og handelspolitikk; og tettere sammenkobling mellom klima- og petroleumspolitikk. Vi viser hvordan nye klimaklubber både lager nye spilleregler og oppstår som motsvar til disse. Vi ønsker med dette å vise hvordan et fragmentert klimaregime fører til nye rammevilkår og utfordringer for norsk klimapolitikk. Klimaklubbkvalene omfatter både problemstillinger knyttet til hvem Norge skal samarbeide med og hvordan slikt samarbeid skal formaliseres, men også konsekvensene av å samarbeide med noen fremfor andre.

• Dooley, Kate; Holz, Christian; Kartha, Sivan; Klinsky, Sonja; Roberts, Timmons & Shue, Henry [Vis alle 18 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change. ISSN 1758-678X. 11(4), s. 300–305. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01015-8. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The Parties to the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement agreed to act on the basis of equity to protect the climate system. Equitable effort sharing is an irreducibly normative matter, yet some influential studies have sought to create quantitative indicators of equitable effort that claim to be value-neutral (despite evident biases). Many of these studies fail to clarify the ethical principles underlying their indicators, some mislabel approaches that favour wealthy nations as ‘equity approaches’ and some combine contradictory indicators into composites we call derivative benchmarks. This Perspective reviews influential climate effort-sharing assessments and presents guidelines for developing and adjudicating policy-relevant (but not ethically neutral) equity research.

• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T.; Lahn, Bård Lappegård; Sundqvist, Göran & Øye, Eirik (2021). Post-Paris policy relevance: lessons from the IPCC SR15 process. Climatic Change. ISSN 0165-0009. 169(1-2), s. 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03210-0. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Policy relevance is the raison d’être for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), yet few studies have analysed what the concept entails, not least from the perspective of key target groups for the IPCC. We present a framework which enables analysis of how different actor strategies (heating up and cooling down) contribute to shape relevance-making in specific political situations when IPCC knowledge is interpreted and used. Drawing on empirical evidence from the reception and use of the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR15) across three policy making levels, the paper demonstrates different examples of creating policy relevance. First, the paper analyses the origin of SR15 and the failed attempts to formally acknowledge SR15 in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process. Second, it investigates how SR15 has been used to develop and legitimize the EU net-zero target and the European Green Deal. Third, the paper demonstrates how SR15 has been used both for legitimizing and challenging climate policy at the national level, using the example of Norway. In sum, the reception of SR15 demonstrates that while IPCC outputs have resulted in controversy at the international level, they have been highly relevant at regional and national levels. The analysis shows that policy relevance is context-dependent and indirect—created through processes involving many actors, institutions, and types of knowledge. Situating these findings within the larger shift in the international climate regime implied by the Paris Agreement, the paper concludes with a set of empirically grounded recommendations for how the IPCC may approach the goal of policy relevance post-Paris.

• Blaxekjær, Lau Øfjord; Lahn, Bård Lappegård; Nielsen, Tobias Dan; Green-Weiskel, Lucia & Fang, Fang (2021). The Narrative Position of the Like-Minded Developing Countries in Global Climate Negotiations. I Klöck, Carola; Castro, Paula; Weiler, Florian & Blaxekjær, Lau Øfjord (Red.), Coalitions in the Climate Change Negotiations. Routledge. ISSN 9780367313210. s. 113–135. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  This edited volume provides both a broad overview of cooperation patterns in the UNFCCC climate change negotiations and an in-depth analysis of specific coalitions and their relations. Over the course of three parts, this book maps out and takes stock of patterns of cooperation in the climate change negotiations since their inception in 1995. In Part I, the authors focus on the evolution of coalitions over time, examining why these emerged and how they function. Part II drills deeper into a set of coalitions, particularly "new" political groups that have emerged in the last rounds of negotiations around the Copenhagen Accord and the Paris Agreement. Finally, Part III explores common themes and open questions in coalition research, and provides a comprehensive overview of coalitions in the climate change negotiations. By taking a broad approach to the study of coalitions in the climate change negotiations, this volume is an essential reference source for researchers, students, and negotiators with an interest in the dynamics of climate negotiations.

• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). A history of the global carbon budget. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change (WIRESs). ISSN 1757-7780. 00:e636, s. 1–9. doi: 10.1002/wcc.636. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The idea of a global “carbon budget”—the cumulative amount of “allowable” carbon emissions to meet a global temperature target—has become established as a central concept in climate science and policy. As a concept explicitly aimed at mediating between scientific knowledge and policymaking, the carbon budget has always been actively positioned in relation to ongoing policy debates, but the specific forms this concept has taken have varied. This article reviews key contributions to the carbon budget literature from the 1980s until today, in order to identify how scientists have positioned the concept between the worlds of science and policy. Three main shifts are identified in how the policy relevance of the carbon budget is envisaged in the scientific literature. The shifts can be related in part to developments in climate science, and in part to changes in international climate policy. The history of the carbon budget thus illustrates how science and policy interacts to shape dominant understandings of how climate change can be known and governed.

• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Changing climate change: The carbon budget and the modifying-work of the IPCC. Social Studies of Science. ISSN 0306-3127. doi: 10.1177/0306312720941933. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Over the last 10 years, the concept of a global ‘carbon budget’ of allowable CO2 emissions has become ubiquitous in climate science and policy. Since it was brought to prominence by the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC, the carbon budget has changed how climate change is enacted as an issue of public concern, from determining the optimal rate of future emissions to establishing a fixed limit for how much emissions should be allowed before they must be stopped altogether. Exploring the emergence of the carbon budget concept, this article shows how the assessment process of the IPCC has offered scientific experts the means to modify how the climate issue is problematized, and discusses the implications of this ‘modifying-work’ for the politics of climate change. It finds that the ‘modified climate issue’ must be seen as an outcome of the ordinary work within established scientific and political institutions, and the agency these institutions afford scientists to enact the issue differently. On this basis, it argues that the case of the carbon budget holds important insights not only for the relationship between climate science and policy, but also for the pragmatist literature on ‘issue formation’ in STS.

• Bang, Guri & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). From oil as welfare to oil as risk? Norwegian petroleum resource governance and climate policy. Climate Policy. ISSN 1469-3062. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1692774. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Norwegian welfare and prosperity have thrived in step with a growing petroleum sector dominating Norway's economy. However, new knowledge about the limits of the world's carbon budget and how this might render some fossil fuel reserves ‘unburnable’ now presents carbon as a potential risk. Carbon risk may be climatic, in that petroleum extraction contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions; or it could be economic, as current investments might end up as ‘stranded assets’ in a world seeking to move beyond oil. Since at least 2013, policy advocacy coalitions have employed the carbon risk concept to challenge two fundamental institutions in Norwegian petroleum resource governance: the licensing of offshore exploration areas and the petroleum tax policy. Drawing on official documents and media statements, as well as workshops and interviews with a broad range of stakeholders in Norwegian climate and petroleum policy, this paper analyses policy processes in which notions of carbon risk have been at the centre of disagreements between opposing advocacy coalitions challenging or defending the status quo of Norwegian petroleum resource governance. We identify a growing mismatch between a discernible change in Norwegian public discourse, on the one hand, and inertia in the petroleum resource management regime, on the other. Increased rhetorical connections between carbon risk and petroleum policies have caused tension and debate that challenge the governance of Norwegian petroleum production.

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Lahn, Bård (2025). Hvem bestemmer over klimaet? - en kort bok om et nesten umulig spørsmål. Forlaget Manifest AS. ISBN 9788283420340. 197 s. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv

Se alle arbeider i NVA

• Lahn, Bård (2026). Justifying oil: The situated valuations of continued fossil fuel extraction. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Although oil is often primarily valued in economic terms, its extraction has also frequently been justified in other registers of value, such as security and geopolitics. As climate change demands a transition away from fossil fuels, however, petrostates are developing new ways of justifying their plans for continued oil extraction. This can take the form of broad claims about the social, economic or environmental value of oil that are often easily dismissed as ‘greenwashing’. But it can also take the form of elaborate technical arrangements that seek to ascribe more specific values to fossil fuels beyond the economic. A case in point is the recent attempt by the government of Norway to ‘prove’ that increased Norwegian oil production is a net benefit to the global climate. In response to legal challenges against new oil fields, the government has introduced new calculative devices that attempt to ascribe positive environmental value to Norwegian oil. These devices are now becoming a standard part of the governing of the country’s oil resources, and can therefore have important consequences for the future trajectory of its oil extraction. This paper takes its point of departure in justification theory as developed by Boltanski and Thevenot (2009), arguing that in order to effectively challenge claims about ‘climate friendly’ or ‘democratic’ oil, we need to better understand the different registers of worth in which states justify continued fossil fuel extraction. Drawing on STS and pragmatist valuation studies (Asdal and Huse 2024; Muniesa 2011), such justifications can be analysed as situated valuation arrangements that combine calculative and political technologies in order to invest oil with value beyond the economic. The paper analyses the Norwegian government’s recent claims about “climate-friendly oil” to demonstrate the value of this analytical approach.

• Lahn, Bård (2026). Norway to expand fossil fuel production as countries seek secure energy supply - The World. [Radio]. The World (US). Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Norway stands to make $78 billion this year from its oil and gas sales. This surge is way beyond previous estimates, as the cost of oil and gas continue to rise due to the US-Israeli war with Iran. With Norway now aiming to increase production, The World’s Host Carolyn Beeler learns more from Bård Lahn, […]

• Lahn, Bård (2026). Dansk grønn deal? sosiologen.no. doi: https:/sosiologen.no/omtale/dansk-gronn-deal/. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2025). Står selve klimasamarbeidet i flammer? doi: https:/www.morgenbladet.no/ideer/star-selve-klimasamarbeidet-i-flammer/10072652. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård & Svenberg, Sebastian (2025). Etikk er også politikk. doi: https:/www.dn.no/innlegg/oljefondet/nbim/etikk/etikk-er-ogsa-politikk/2-1-1909386. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2025). Climate, energy and societal change. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2025). Unburnable oil: The geo-economic tools of making and unmaking fossil fuels. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2025). Great expectations: Ownership devices and legitimacy work in Norway’s sovereign wealth fund. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2025). Hvordan brukes scenarioer i praksis? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Klimamål og oljestopp: Hvor ligger uenighetene? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Quantifying the oil economy: Unknown geological resources as future revenue. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). The oil sector: Norway's Achilles heel? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Ekko i NRK P2: Er klimakampen død? [Radio]. NRK P2. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Climate hero or villain? Fossil fuel frenzy challenges Norway’s green image. [Internet]. The Guardian. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Dilemmaer i olje- og klimapolitikken. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Making unknown oil (un)burnable: Geological and economic tools for governing oil futures. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2024). Prognoser og politikk: Om framtiden til norsk olje og gass. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). The futures of oil. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). Olje, omstilling og klimapolitikk. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). Hva anbefalte utvalget? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2023). Analysis: Norway Is Planning to Profit From Climate Change. [Internet]. Foreign Policy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). Forsker: Formulering om å fase ut «urenset» fossil energi åpner for å forlenge fossilalderen. [Internet]. Altinget.no. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). Melkøya og elektrifisering som klimatiltak. [Internet]. Dag og Tid (podkast). Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Regjeringa har bestemt at Equinor-anlegget Hammerfest LNG skal elektrifiserast frå land. Det vil kutte 850.000 tonn i årlege CO2-utslepp frå gassturbinane på øya. Kva ligg bak denne avgjerda og er det eit godt klimatiltak? Bård Lahn er gjest. Han har forska på norsk og internasjonal klimapolitikk, ressursforvaltning og oljepolitikk. Kva meiner han om elektrifisering som klimatiltak? Og kjem me til å nå klimamåla for 2030?

• Lahn, Bård (2023). Klimavorreiter und Ölriese – geht das? Wie Norwegens Pläne Europa beeinflussen. [Internet]. Perspective Daily. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård (2023). Dimensions of climate justice. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). Nye utfordringer for oljelandet? Paris-målene og produksjon av fornybar energi. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). How do policymakers use information on NETs portrayed in scenarios? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). Tore Wig unngår å stille det mest interessante spørsmålet. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). Strategier i klimapolitikken. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). Status i det internasjonale klimaarbeidet etter toppmøtet i Egypt. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Farstad, Fay Madeleine; Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). For better or for worse – a break with Norway’s consensual climate tradition? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Farstad, Fay Madeleine; Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2022). For better or for worse – a break with Norway’s consensual climate tradition? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Map-makers and navigators? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård & Farstad, Fay Madeleine (2021). Norway’s ‘Climate Election’ Puts Center-Left in Charge. [Journal]. The New York Times. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). The Climate Question: When will countries stop exploring for oil? [Radio]. BBC Radio (podcast). Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Myter om klimamål i Norge og EU. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Å sette vitenskapen på (riktig) plass: Bidrag til enquête om Bruno Latour. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Asdal, Kristin & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Oil matters: Tools of governing and tools of valuation in turning oil into a risky asset. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård & Andrew, Robbie (2021). Slik går Norge fra å være miniputt til gigant på klimastatistikken. [Internet]. NRK. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Klimatoppmøtet i Glasgow startet i dag. [TV]. NRK Dagsnytt atten. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). En lang vei til enighet. [Journal]. Klassekampen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård; Skodvin, Tora; Sælen, Håkon; Farstad, Fay Madeleine & Sandanger, Gunnell (2021). Ny grønn giv med USA? [Internet]. CICERO - KLIMA. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  Joe Biden har vunnet valget i USA – kan vi håpe på en grønn ny giv? Hvilken innflytelse har miljøbevegelsen i USA, og hva skjer med internasjonal klimapolitikk?

• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Making carbon matter: Climate politics and the governing of Norwegian oil. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Klimamål, oljeproduksjon og bruk av scenarier. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Norway wants to lead on climate change. But first it must face its legacy of oil and gas. [Internet]. Vox.com. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Norwegian oil production and global greenhouse gas emissions. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Why countries disagree about climate change. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). The climate issue(s): Accounting for the environment. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). Klimamål i oljedebatten: Kommentarer til Perspektivmeldingen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2021). The climate issue(s) and the road ahead: what role(s) for science? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård; Hermansen, Erlend Andre T.; Sognnæs, Ida Andrea Braathen & Peters, Glen Philip (2020). How do policymakers use climate mitigation scenario information? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Oljen utfordrer norsk klimatroverdighet. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Det norske paradokset: Klimaleder og oljeprodusent. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Fem år etter Paris – hvor står vi? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Miljø- og klimapolitikk: Globalitet og grenser. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Asdal, Kristin & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Valuing the oil economy: On climate targets and ‘tools of valuation’. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Dagsnytt 18: Politisk styring av oljeindustrien. [Radio]. NRK P2. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård & Normann, Håkon Endresen (2020). Låst til oljen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). The Climate Society and the road ahead. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Knowledge and expertise in environmental policy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Usikre odds for ny grønn deal. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2020). Hva gjør vi med 'produksjonsgapet'? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Climate neutrality the Norwegian way: Carbon trading? Energi og Klima : Norsk klimastiftelses nettmagasin. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Økte klimaambisjoner i New York? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Internasjonal klimapolitikk - fra Paris til New York. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Halvorsen, Kristin & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Planlagt produksjon av fossil energi bryter med klimamålene. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Climate neutrality the Norwegian way: Carbon trading? KLIMA - Et magasin om klimaforskning fra CICERO. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Dagsnytt 18: Klimatoppmøte i New York. [Radio]. NRK P2. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Olje i klimakamp: Hvor ligger uenighetene? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). På leting etter en oljesosiologi: Tre prøveboringer. sosiologen.no. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Internasjonal klimapolitikk for dummies. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). "Paris-gapet" mellom globale og nasjonale utslippsmål. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). COP 24 og "ambisjonsmekanismen" i Paris-avtalen. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Klimasaken: Hva er det vi er uenige om? Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Accounting for the environment: Science and numbers in political and bureaucratic practices. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Aamaas, Borgar & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Når vitenskap blir politikk. KLIMA - Et magasin om klimaforskning fra CICERO. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Bærekraftig utvikling - i Nord og Sør. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Distributional justice in the international climate regime. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Knowledge and expertise in environmental policy. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Science as a fragile bridge over troubled waters? The role of the IPCC in bridging the ambition gap in the Paris Agreement. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hermansen, Erlend Andre T. & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). The Climate Society and the road ahead. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Vetlesen, Arne Johan; Lahn, Bård Lappegård & Martiniussen, Erik (2019). Hvem er "vi" i klimaendringenes tid? [Journal]. Prosa - tidsskrift for skribenter. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Hagem, Cathrine; Fæhn, Taran & Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Klimaeffekt av oljekutt. Adresseavisen. ISSN 0805-3804. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Lahn, Bård & Asdal, Kristin (2022). Carbon connections: On the work of making climate change an issue for politics and government. Universitetet i Oslo. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv
• Alnes, Kristina; Sælen, Håkon; Lund, Harald Francke; Lahn, Bård Lappegård; Eine, Kristin & Alfsen, Knut H. [Vis alle 7 forfattere av denne artikkelen] (2021). Climate assessments of six key Norwegian sectors. CICERO Senter for Klimaforskning. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The Sustainable Edge sector briefs summarize material climate-related risks and impacts to investors and lenders. The briefscover key risks, emission sources, risk management and climate-related regulation relevant for each sector. They also provide key analyst questions that are important to consider in order to understand the climate risk of companies in the sector. The sector briefs are developed to support capacity building on climate risk in financial institutions. The six sectors covered are agriculture, aluminium, aquaculture, land transport, real estate, and shipping. The next section summarizes some key messages from each brief.

• Lahn, Bård Lappegård (2019). Norwegian petroleum policy in a changing climate. CICERO Senter for Klimaforskning. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv Vis sammendrag

  The report provides an up-to-date account of the debates about how Norway can best handle its paradoxical position between oil dependence and climate leadership ambitions. Historically, political actors have sought to reconcile Norway’s goals of climate leadership and petroleum production by separating climate and petroleum policymaking into separate domains. Over the last ten years, however, this separation has increasingly been challenged, leading to a marked increase in political controversy around the future of the Norwegian oil and gas industry. The report gives an overview of the historical background for Norwegian petroleum and climate policy, and details more recent changes in public attitudes, political fault lines, and more specific policy changes currently under discussion. By focusing on the case of Norway, the report aims to inform broader debates about the relationship between fossil fuel extraction and climate policy, as this relationship is attracting increasing attention from climate policy analysts and policymakers internationally.

Se alle arbeider i NVA