About the project
Deportation of irregular migrants and rejected asylum seekers is widely known to pit host states against these migrants, but deportation also pits host states against these migrants’ origin states. Liberal European host states cannot unilaterally send migrants back to the origin state they come from. They depend on the origin state’s political willingness to readmit these migrants, and they depend on its practical assistance with identification and travel documents.
Without this kind of cooperation with origin states, immigration law may not be enforceable. Yet origin states have political, economic and cultural reasons not to collaborate. This partly explains why relatively few—less than half—of Europe’s unauthorised migrants are deported. Conceptualising this as a conflict of interests, legal scholars and political scientists have focused on the incentives and coercion used by the host state to elicit the rational compliance of the origin state.
NORMS takes a path less trodden and trail-blazes an exploration of social norms in this field. It looks at how state agents from host and origin states alike seek to legitimise or de-legitimise deportation, promoting competing norms in a contested policy field.
Objectives
NORMS' objectives are to answer the following questions:
- How do host and origin state agents involved with deportation normatively understand it?
- To which extent, how and under which conditions do these state agents engage in norm entrepreneurship to legitimise or delegitimise deportation?
- How do national norms of deportation evolve?
- To which extent and how do norms of deportation clash within the EU border agency Frontex?
NORMS examines these questions with a practice-oriented and cross-country comparative approach to the norm dynamics. The comparative design includes one host state with high deportation rates (Norway) and one with low deportation rates (Sweden), as well as four unconsolidated states of origin (Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Ethiopia).
Moreover, NORMS also examines norm dynamics at the supranational level, as narrated by Norwegian and Swedish police officers who have participated in return operations carried out by the EU agency Frontex.
The project identifies the norms that determine (non-)deportability and theorises the scoping conditions under which they are promoted and contested.
Previous events
Return and Readmission: A Normative Approach
Time and place: – , Oslo
This workshop aims to problematize and go beyond the rationalist bias of the literature on return and readmission to explore the ‘logic of appropriateness’ and how it operates in the field. This involves shifting focus away from hard power only, and formal policies, such as readmission agreements, to include more normative perspectives on return and readmission as an international practice.
The workshop is a joint effort by the Norwegian Institute for Social Research and the ARENA Centre for European Studies at the University of Oslo, through the research project Deporting Foreigners: Contested Norms in International Practice (NORMS), and is co-organized by Erlend Paasche and Nicole Ostrand.
