A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

Jarle Trondal has co-authored an article in European Journal of Risk Regulation, explaining how the EU’s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) may be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies.

Image may contain: Hand, Human, Recipe, Gesture, Finger.

Abstract

Regulation is nothing without enforcement. This particularly holds for the dynamic field of emerging technologies. Hence, this article has two ambitions. First, it explains how the EU’s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) may be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies, thus clarifying the governance framework of the AIA. Second, it proposes a normative governance model, providing recommendations to ensure uniform and coordinated execution of the AIA and the fulfillment of the legislation. The article explores how the AIA may be implemented by national and EU institutional bodies, encompassing longstanding bodies, such as the European Commission, and those newly established under the AIA, such as the AI Office. It investigates their roles across supranational and national levels, emphasising how EU regulations influence institutional structures and operations. These regulations may not only directly dictate the structural design of institutions but also indirectly request administrative capacities needed to enforce the AIA.

Full info

Jarle Trondal, Claudio Novelli, Philipp Hacker, Jessica Morley, Luciano Floridi

A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.57

Published Sep. 9, 2025 2:20 PM - Last modified Dec. 5, 2025 10:27 AM