Unpacking normativity in transformative change: A comparative analysis of directionality in Norwegian and Dutch agri-food policy (1945–2023)

Sustainability transitions are inherently political and normative - yet transition research has rarely engaged explicitly with the values that shape policy directions. This paper compares nearly eight decades of Dutch and Norwegian agri-food policy, tracing how problem frames, policy solutions, and underlying values produced different pathways while sharing a persistent dominance of economic values over social and ecological concerns.

Authors: Sabine de Graaff, Iris Wanzenböck, Koen Frenken

Abstract: Normative values such as ‘justice’ or ‘sustainability’ are envisaged to guide transformative change. However, transition research that explicitly studies normativity remains limited. We study policy problem frames, policy solutions and their underlying values to compare directionality in the history of Dutch and Norwegian agri-food policy. While Norwegian policies emphasize protectionism and national food security, Dutch policies promote a liberal, market-oriented approach. Our analysis uncovers a persistent dominance of economic values over social and ecological considerations in both policy contexts, highlighting the entrenchment of economic growth ideals within Western European agri-food systems and revealing relevant value tensions. Overall, the paper argues that directionality is an inherently normative and political process, shaped by competing values embedded in historical trajectories. Recognizing this complexity calls for increased reflexivity and active engagement with just transition perspectives to navigate value tensions and advance sustainable and just transition pathways for future agri-food systems.

You can read the full paper in Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

Published Apr. 27, 2026 11:52 AM - Last modified Apr. 27, 2026 11:52 AM