Party-Interest Group Relationships in Contemporary Democracies: Character, Causes and Consequences (PAIRDEM) (completed)
A common view in scholarly literature and public debate is that the relationship between parties and interest groups shapes the nature of democratic governance. Still, party-group relationships have been largely overlooked by political scientists to date and taken for granted across different countries, institutional make-ups, types of party systems, and sectors. The proposed research project will advance the state of the art in this field by seeking to systematically examine the nature, the shaping factors and the consequences for policy-making of party-group relationships in long-established democracies across the world.
About the project
The project will provide a truly comparative study of the varieties and impact of party-group relationships on a scale hitherto unparalleled within the social and political sciences. It will break new ground by examining party-group links from both sides rather than using either groups or parties as starting point. Aiming to renew both theory and methods within party/interest group research, we believe this new study will be of great value to the different kinds of scholars concerned with questions about the nature and effects of varying party-group relationships in democratic politics, and may also impact on those who run, belong to and report on the organizations involved.
The relationship between political parties and interest groups is a multi-dimensional phenomenon, and how to study it is open to debate. Accordingly, we will first look for a way to conceptualize party-group relationships that reduces the dimensions along which they can vary so that, after having mapped similarities and differences, we can examine the factors that shape them and their political impact. Empirically, the major goals of the project are to:
- Map the character of contemporary party-interest group relationships, mainly as an organizational phenomenon
- Identify the shaping factors of party-group relationships in this sense (at the country and party/group level)
- Measure patterns of party-group influence and the impact of on public policy
In this way, we also hope to expose the broader role of party-group relationships in democratic governance. For more information on the conceptual issues, research questions and hypotheses of the project, please contact the Principal Investigator, Elin Haugsgjerd Allern.
The project will be designed as a genuine comparative study across countries. With an eye on tractability and feasibility, we concentrate on the national/leadership level of politics. The units of analysis for are first, political parties and second, interest groups, but also the relationships as such (the dyads). Countries will be compared in terms of general patterns of party-group relationships. We look at the extra-parliamentary organization, but include parliamentary groups, too, since parties in some countries only have weak central organizations. In this way, we can also compare across ‘faces’ of parties, and touch more directly upon public decision-making as far as general patterns of influence is concerned. The project is divided into three main empirical modules: 1) an extensive study of all long-established democracies, 2) a detailed comparative study of parties and interest groups in 7-8 selected countries and 3) use of other (existing) data sets. The project includes a considerable data collection effort, including mapping of party statutes, a party survey, and an interest group survey, mapping of elite networks and perhaps also interviews with those involved in policy-making.
Project Organization and Funding
The project runs from Autumn 2014 to Winter 2020 and is financed by the national funding scheme "FRIHUMSAM Young Research Talents" (The Research Council of Norway) together with the University of Oslo. A core research group of nine persons (see List of participants) with complementary general expertise and different geographical backgrounds all contribute to the development of the conceptualization, the more detailed research design, to the data analysis and to publications. The team members also serves as advisors for the data collection in various countries/areas, supplemented by a few country supervisors to be affiliated (see List of affiliated researchers). All of the team members bring extensive, but only partly overlapping research networks into the project. The project will be managed at the University of Oslo, by Elin Haugsgjerd Allern. Numerous research assistants are engaged by the project, in different countries. Moreover, a postdoctoral fellow was recruited to work with the project manager in Oslo after the project started.
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Hansen, Vibeke Wøien; Rødland, Lise; Maiken, Røed; Klüver, Heike & Le Gall, Cal [Show all 12 contributors for this article] (2022). Introducing the Party-interest group relationships in contemporary democracies datasets. Party Politics. ISSN 1354-0688. doi: 10.1177/13540688221075591. Full text in Research Archive
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Hansen, Vibeke Wøien; Marshall, David; Rasmussen, Anne & Webb, Paul D (2020). Competition and interaction: Party ties to interest groups in a multidimensional policy space. European Journal of Political Research. ISSN 0304-4130. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12403. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Bale, Tim (2017). The Relationship between Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions. In Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Bale, Tim (Ed.), Left-of-centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. ISSN 978-0-19-879047-1. p. 1–25. doi: 10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198790471.003.0001.
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Bale, Tim & Otjes, Simon (2017). The Relationship between Left-of-Centre Parties and Trade Unions in Contemporary Democracies. In Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Bale, Tim (Ed.), Left-of-centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. ISSN 978-0-19-879047-1. p. 280–309. doi: 10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198790471.003.0015.
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Verge, Tania (2017). Still Connecting with Society? Political Parties' Formal Links with Social Groups in the 21st Century. In Scarrow, Susan E; Webb, Paul D & Poguntke, Thomas (Ed.), Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford University Press. ISSN 9780198758631.
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Bale, Tim & Otjes, Simon (2017). Mapping Party-Trade Union Relationships in Contemporary Democracies. In Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Bale, Tim (Ed.), Left-of-centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. ISSN 978-0-19-879047-1. p. 26–53. doi: 10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198790471.003.0002.
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd; Bale, Tim & Otjes, Simon (2017). Variations in Party-Union Relationships: Explanations and Implications. In Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Bale, Tim (Ed.), Left-of-centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. ISSN 978-0-19-879047-1. p. 310–341. doi: 10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780198790471.003.0016.
Allern, Elin Haugsgjerd & Bale, Tim (2017). Left-of-centre Parties and Trade Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-879047-1. 379 p.
Hansen, Vibeke Wøien & Maiken, Røed (2018). Explaining participation bias in EU online consultations. EUROPP. LSE blog.