Jens Jungblut

• Stensaker, Bjørn; Jungblut, Jens Patrick Wilhelm & Mihut, Georgiana (2021). Strategic advisory boards – the emergence of shadow governance in universities?. International Journal of Leadership in Education.  ISSN 1360-3124. . doi: 10.1080/13603124.2021.1913237
• Blum, Sonja & Jungblut, Jens (2020). Besondere Freiheit, besondere Verantwortung? Eine empirische Studie zur deutschen Politikwissenschaft in der Politikberatung / Academic Freedom, Academic Responsibility? An Empirical Study on the Policy-advisory Role of German Political Scientists. Der moderne Staat.  ISSN 1865-7192.  13(2), s 486- 506 . doi: https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v13i2.12 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Jungblut, Jens (2020). European Research Area, In Marylin J. Amey & Miriam E. David (ed.),  SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.  Sage Publications.  ISBN 9781473942912.  chapter.  s 491 - 496
• Jungblut, Jens (2020). Nordic Countries, Higher Education in, In Marylin J. Amey & Miriam E. David (ed.),  SAGE Encyclopedia of Higher Education.  Sage Publications.  ISBN 9781473942912.  chapter.  s 1103 - 1108
• Jungblut, Jens Patrick Wilhelm; Maassen, Peter & Elken, Mari (2020). Quo Vadis EHEA: Balancing Structural Continuation and Political Variety, In  European Higher Education Area: Challenges for a New Decade.  Springer.  ISBN 9783030563158.  NA.  s 391 - 415 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Reymert, Ingvild S; Jungblut, Jens Patrick Wilhelm & Borlaug, Siri Brorstad (2020). Are evaluative cultures national or global? A cross-national study on evaluative cultures in academic recruitment processes in Europe. Higher Education.  ISSN 0018-1560. . doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00659-3 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  Studies on academic recruitment processes have demonstrated that universities evaluate candidates for research positions using multiple criteria. However, most studies on preferences regarding evaluative criteria in recruitment processes focus on a single country, while cross-country studies are rare. Additionally, though studies have documented how fields evaluate candidates differently, those differences have not been deeply explored, thus creating a need for further inquiry. This paper aims to address this gap and investigates whether academics in two fields across five European countries prefer the same criteria to evaluate candidates for academic positions. The analysis is based on recent survey data drawn from academics in economics and physics in Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. Our results show that the academic fields have different evaluative cultures and that researchers from different fields prefer specific criteria when assessing candidates. We also found that these field-specific preferences were to some extent mediated through national frameworks such as funding systems.

• Zapp, Mike; Jungblut, Jens & Ramirez, Francisco O. (2020). Legitimacy, stratification, and internationalization in global higher education: the case of the International Association of Universities. Tertiary Education and Management.  ISSN 1358-3883. . doi: 10.1007/s11233-020-09062-0 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Seidenschnur, Tim; Veiga, Amélia; Jungblut, Jens & Magalhães, António (2019). Hopes, beliefs, and concerns: narratives in German and Portuguese universities regarding Brexit. Higher Education.  ISSN 0018-1560.  79(5), s 867- 884 . doi: 10.1007/s10734-019-00443-y Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Maassen, Peter; Jungblut, Jens & Elken, Mari (2020). Quo vadis European Higher Education Area: balancing structural continuation and political variety.
• Reymert, Ingvild S; Jungblut, Jens & Borlaug, Siri Brorstad (2019). National or global standards? A cross-national study on assessment criteria in academic recruitment processes in Europe.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin