In the article, Fabian Hoffmann identifies four strategic functions long-range strike weapons can fulfill to create strategic-level effects: (1) counter-population, (2) strategic interdiction, (3) counter-leadership, and (4) counterforce. By fulfilling these functions, LRS can undermine the will and/or capacity of the adversary to resist at the strategic level of warfare, independent of warfighting efforts located at the tactical and operational levels.
The article applies these arguments in an analysis of China's conventional missile arsenal and doctrine. The analysis suggests that Chinese leaders believe that employing LRS for strategic functions constitutes a potentially effective way of subduing their enemies. The findings have implications for scholars' and policymakers' understanding of the role of LRS in international politics and contemporary warfare.
The article is open-access and can be downloaded freely via this link .