The evaluation of the master's thesis is based on both the quality of the analysis and the presentation of the material. This includes an assessment of the clarity and academic relevance of the research question, the grounding of the work in relevant theory and literature, the quality of the methodology used, the persuasiveness of the analysis and its results, as well as linguistic precision and correct use of references and citations.
Grades A and B are awarded when these aspects are described as "excellent" or "very good". Grade C is awarded when all the aspects are described as "good". Grades D and E are awarded when they are described as "satisfactory" or "sufficient".
|
Research question |
|
|
Integration with the academic literature |
|
|
Research design |
|
|
Implementation and findings |
|
|
Language and references |
|
|
A |
Excellent |
An excellent thesis with original analysis, where the research question is very well grounded in the field's literature. The thesis also stands out for its clear use of methodology and presentation of the material. |
|
B |
Very good |
A very good analysis with a clear research question that is well grounded in the field's literature. The thesis also demonstrates proficiency in its use of methodology and presentation of the material. |
|
C |
Good |
A good thesis overall, featuring a clear research question and a well-conducted analysis grounded in the field's literature. Additionally, the thesis demonstrates competence in both its methodology and presentation of the material. |
|
D |
Satisfactory |
The thesis is generally good, with adequate analysis; however, it also demonstrates weaknesses in formulating the research question, research design, conducting the analysis, methodological skills, or presentation |
|
E |
Sufficient |
A thesis where the analysis meets the minimum requirements for academic presentation and discussion, but which exhibits substantial deficiencies in formulating the research question, research design, conducting the analysis, methodological skills, or presentation. |
|
F |
Fail |
The thesis fails to meet the minimum requirements for scientific presentation and discussion, showing significant deficiencies in formulating the research question, research design, conducting the analysis, methodological skills, citation usage, presentation, or meeting the minimum standards of research ethics. |
See «Grading and grading scales - University of Oslo (uio.no)» or «Forskrift om studier og eksamener ved Universitetet i Oslo § 6.1.» for general descriptions of grades.