Markus Bugge

• Saidi, Trust; Thune, Taran Mari & Bugge, Markus (2020). Making ‘hidden innovation’ visible? A case study of an innovation management system in health care. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.  ISSN 0953-7325.  s 1- 13 . doi: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1841156
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Bugge, Markus; Wollscheid, Sabine & Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2020). Ready to Go? Schools? Preparedness for Teaching and Learning Within a One-to-One Program. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS).  ISSN 0302-9743.  12066, s 569- 580 . doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_47
• Bugge, Markus; Bolwig, Simon; Hansen, Teis & Tanner, Anne Nygaard (2019). Theoretical perspectives on innovation for waste valorisation in the bioeconomy, In Antje Klitkou; Arne Martin Fevolden & Marco Capasso (ed.),  From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-0-429-46028-9.  3.  s 51 - 70 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2019). Mission-oriented innovation in urban governance: setting and solving problems in waste valorisation, In Antje Klitkou; Arne Martin Fevolden & Marco Capasso (ed.),  From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-0-429-46028-9.  5.  s 91 - 106 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Bugge, Markus; Hansen, Teis & Klitkou, Antje (2019). What is the bioeconomy?, In Antje Klitkou; Arne Martin Fevolden & Marco Capasso (ed.),  From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-0-429-46028-9.  2.  s 19 - 50 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2019). Directionality and diversity: Contending policy rationales in the transition towards the bioeconomy, In Antje Klitkou; Arne Martin Fevolden & Marco Capasso (ed.),  From Waste to Value: Valorisation Pathways for Organic Waste Streams in Circular Bioeconomies.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-0-429-46028-9.  12.  s 233 - 252 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Wollscheid, Sabine; Stensaker, Bjørn & Bugge, Markus (2019). Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in the Field of Education: The Dilemmas Related to Organizational Design. European Education : Issues and Studies.  ISSN 1056-4934.  51(4) . doi: 10.1080/10564934.2019.1619465 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  Evidence-informed policy and practice has been a trend as part of an effort to increase the use of research to improve education at all levels. In many countries, knowledge-brokering initiatives were established to stimulate links between research, policy, and practice. Drawing on a mapping of initiatives in seven countries, this article describes different organizational designs, and discusses potential dilemmas these might imply for the realization of these organizations’ roles. Given different interests involved, the article shows that organizational design is crucial for enhancing legitimacy. Findings indicate a trend toward locating the knowledge-brokering function in a combined policy–science logic.

• Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars & Branstad, Are (2018). Governing socio-technical change: Orchestrating demand for assisted living in ageing societies. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  45(4), s 468- 479 . doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy010 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in innovation studies towards grand challenges, and in how demand-side policy instruments can supplement traditional supply-side policy measures. To contribute to an improved understanding of how demand-side policy requires new governance responses, this article presents a case study of trialling assisted living technologies to address the grand challenge of demographic ageing. The article departs from an innovation policy framework that incorporates theorising on transformational system failures, governance modes, and policy mixes. This framework serves as an entry point to explore how different modes of governance condition the ways in which demand for assisted living in healthcare is orchestrated across multiple stakeholders. The case study is embedded in a wider system shift from a reactive to a proactive system of healthcare provision, enabling the elderly to live independently at home longer and thus avoiding or postponing institutionalised care.

• Bugge, Markus; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje (2018). Governance for system optimization and system change: The case of urban waste. Research Policy.  ISSN 0048-7333.  48(4), s 1076- 1090 . doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.013 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  This paper analyses urban waste systems to explore how local authorities can resolve challenges related to climate change, urbanization and resource depletion. The paper investigates how different public governance regimes affect local authorities’ ability to move upwards in the waste hierarchy. It identifies three different governance regimes – traditional bureaucracy, new public management and networked governance – and uses the insights from innovation in urban waste in three Norwegian city regions – Oslo, Drammen and Bergen – to illuminate how these regimes possess both strengths and weaknesses in how they affect system optimization and system change. The observed working practices signal that the issue of urban waste systems is perceived as a challenge of system optimization rather than system change. Viewing this as a challenge requiring system change would probably have ensured a stronger directionality and a broader anchoring of actors. Such an approach is likely to have arrived at a waste prevention mode earlier than the step-by-step-solutions implemented so far. The paper concludes that there is not one best governance regime, but a need to acknowledge their co-existence and carefully consider the characteristics of the respective regimes in order to arrange urban waste systems for long-term dynamic and sustainable city regions.

• Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars; Marques, Pedro & Morgan, Kevin (2017). Governing system innovation: assisted living experiments in the UK and Norway. European Planning Studies.  ISSN 0965-4313.  25(12), s 2138- 2156 . doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1349078 Vis sammendrag

  Debates on how to address societal challenges have moved to the forefront of academic and policy concerns. Of particular importance is the growing awareness that to deal with issues such as ageing, it will be necessary to implement concerted efforts on technological, social, institutional or political fronts. Drawing on a number of theoretical perspectives – including socio-technical transitions and embedded state theory – the aim of this paper is to identify and understand different approaches to the governance of such system innovations by comparing state responses to assisted living in two contrasting national systems of care, namely that of the UK and Norway. Its findings highlight that state-supported and funded experimentation projects have been instrumental in designing and implementing system innovation: through their emphasis on co-design and co-creation, these projects demonstrated the value of early implementation pilots to explore the ‘fit’ between novel technologies and prevailing practices and institutional structures in national systems of care. Still, competition, biases or conflicting interests should not be ignored between well-established agents and institutions and experimental solutions whose efficacy remains relatively untested and which involve a combination of new technical, social, organizational and institutional solutions.

• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2017). Directionality across diversity: governing contending policy rationales in the transition towards the bioeconomy. Sustainability.  ISSN 2071-1050.  9(2) . doi: 10.3390/su9020206 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  Although the bioeconomy has been embraced by many governments around the world as a way of responding to the grand challenge of climate change, it remains unclear what the bioeconomy is and how it can contribute to achieving these broad policy objectives. The aim of this paper is to improve our understanding of whether, and how, the bioeconomy includes contending rationales for governance and policy-making. In order to do this, we apply a typology of three bioeconomy visions onto the policy discourse on the bioeconomy. These visions are (1) a bio-technology vision; (2) a bio-resource vision; and (3) a bio-ecology vision. Based on a discourse analysis of 41 submissions to a public hearing on the development of a bioeconomy strategy in Norway, the paper explores the actors involved in shaping the new bioeconomy and analyses their positions on this emerging field. The paper finds that it is possible to categorise the consultative inputs into these three visions, and also that the bio-resource vision is predominant, which reflects the structure of the national economy. Moreover, the paper reflects upon how the contending visions observed imply negotiations and power struggles, which may hamper directionality in the current socio-technical transition.

• Coenen, Lars; Asheim, Bjørn Terje; Bugge, Markus & Herstad, Sverre Johan (2016). Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table?. Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy.  ISSN 0263-774X. . doi: 10.1177/0263774X16646583 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Bugge, Markus & Bloch, Carter (2016). Between bricolage and breakthroughs—framing the many faces of public sector innovation. Public Money & Management.  ISSN 0954-0962.  36(4), s 281- 288 . doi: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1162599
• Bugge, Markus; Hansen, Teis & Klitkou, Antje (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability.  ISSN 2071-1050.  8:691(7) . doi: 10.3390/su8070691 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  The notion of the bioeconomy has gained importance in both research and policy debates over the last decade, and is frequently argued to be a key part of the solution to multiple grand challenges. Despite this, there seems to be little consensus concerning what bioeconomy actually implies. Consequently, this paper seeks to enhance our understanding of what the notion of bioeconomy means by exploring the origins, uptake, and contents of the term “bioeconomy” in the academic literature. Firstly, we perform a bibliometric analysis that highlights that the bioeconomy research community is still rather fragmented and distributed across many different fields of science, even if natural and engineering sciences take up the most central role. Secondly, we carry out a literature review that identifies three visions of the bioeconomy. The bio-technology vision emphasises the importance of bio-technology research and application and commercialisation of bio-technology in different sectors of the economy. The bio-resource vision focuses on processing and upgrading of biological raw materials, as well as on the establishment of new value chains. Finally, the bio-ecology vision highlights sustainability and ecological processes that optimise the use of energy and nutrients, promote biodiversity, and avoid monocultures and soil degradation.

• Bugge, Markus & Thune, Taran Mari (2016). Situated Knowledge Spillovers: A Case Study of Industry Specificity in Urban Knowledge Sourcing. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography.  ISSN 0435-3684.  98(3), s 255- 270 . doi: 10.1111/geob.12097
• Bugge, Markus & Øiestad, Sara (2015). The Micro-foundations of Regional Branching—the Case of Digitization of Publishing. European Planning Studies.  ISSN 0965-4313.  23(4), s 764- 784 . doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.970131 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Bugge, Markus & Øiestad, Sara (2014). Digitisation of publishing: Exploration based on existing business models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.  ISSN 0040-1625.  83(1), s 54- 65 . doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.010 Vis sammendrag

  Like other creative industries, the book publishing industry is currently experiencing a shift from analogue to digital technologies and formats. This shift challenges existing business models and impels firms to re-examine their product portfolios and core competencies. Through a qualitative case study of the three largest publishing houses in Norway, Aschehoug, Cappelen Damm and Gyldendal, this paper investigates how digitisation affects business models in the book publishing industry. The paper argues that the publishing houses are two-faced in meeting new digital technologies. The industry has come relatively far in developing industry standards and joint distribution systems. However, the functionality and user experience of digital products is still poor, prices are still high, and the share of Norwegian language digital titles is low. In addition, knowledge acquisition from consumers and lead users are suboptimal. Due to divergence in goals, formats and markets, there is a lack of a common dominant design for digital publishing. This represents a substantial uncertainty for the publishers, who are moving step-by-step into the new digital era and whose exploration of new market opportunities and alternative business models remains anchored in traditional and analogue business models. The paper also discusses how current institutions contribute to preserve the analogue publishing regime.

• Bloch, Carter & Bugge, Markus (2013). Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics.  ISSN 0954-349X.  27, s 133- 145 . doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008 Vis sammendrag

  While there is growing awareness that much innovation currently takes place in the publicsector, it is also recognised that more systematic efforts to promote innovation are neededto address the economic and societal challenges that public sectors face. However, there is alack of a common understanding of what public sector innovation is and a lack of a measure-ment framework that can shed light on innovation processes in public sector organisations.Based on insights generated in a recent Nordic pilot study, this paper seeks to contribute tofill this gap. The paper discusses how public sector innovation can be captured and to whatextent measurement can be based on frameworks originally developed in a private sectorcontext. While there are important differences between the public and the private sectorthat should be reflected in a measurement framework, there is also considerable commonground that can be drawn upon.

• Bugge, Markus & Skålholt, Asgeir (2013). Smart velferd: Styringsparadigmer for innovasjon i kommunene, I: Toril M Ringholm; Håvard Teigen & Nils Aarsæther (red.),  Innovative kommuner.  Cappelen Damm Akademisk.  ISBN 978-82-02-41182-4.  Kapittel 3.  s 53 - 70
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen (2011). Creative Distraction: Lack of collective learning in adapting to online advertising in Oslo, Norway. Industry and Innovation.  ISSN 1366-2716.  18(2), s 227- 248 . doi: 10.1080/13662716.2011.541106 Vis sammendrag

  The advertising industry is often seen as adaptable and flexible, and its work organization and diverse project ecologies are assumed to nurture creativity, learning and innovation. The advertising industry in Oslo is currently going through a restructuring process of adapting to the Internet as an emerging media channel for marketing, but struggles to benefit from collective learning. The established advertising agencies have been reluctant regarding the new opportunities in Internet-based advertising, which has allowed for a set of smaller and specialized web agencies to emerge, and who now possess the best skills within interactive advertising. The paper argues that there are two parallel epistemic communities in the localized advertising industry. It is shown that the advertising industry seems to have been caught in a path-dependent technological trajectory, and that in order for collective learning to unfold geographical proximity needs to be supplemented by cultural and epistemic proximity and compatibility.

• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen (2011). Jacobian Cluster Mutation across Advertising and Internet-based Market Communication. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie.  ISSN 0040-747X.  102(5), s 515- 531 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00652.x Vis sammendrag

  The advertising industry is currently undergoing a profound restructuring process, where traditional media like TV and print are being complemented and replaced by new forms of online and interactive advertising. The versatile and interactive nature of the Internet medium represents new opportunities and challenges for the advertising agencies that transcend their traditional role as developers of creative contents and campaigns. The paper discusses how this transformation process affects services in the new online market communication regime. Based on a case study on how the Internet affects the advertising industry and its related actors the paper argues that the introduction and growth of Internet-based market communication leads to a convergence of creative, strategic and technical services. It is suggested that this represents a new production and market communication space in which the end consumer often plays a more pro-active and participatory role. The paper argues that the convergence of skills and services across advertising and information and communications technology can be viewed as a Jacobian cluster mutation across related and co-evolving industrial agglomerations. The empirical findings are interpreted and conceptualised as a cyclical relationship between knowledge externalities associated with specialisation and differentiation.

• Andersen, Kristina Værst; Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Hansen, Høgni Kalsø; Isaksen, Arne & Raunio, Mika (2010). One Size Fits All? Applying the Creative Class Thesis onto a Nordic Context. European Planning Studies.  ISSN 0965-4313.  18(10), s 1591- 1609 . doi: 10.1080/09654313.2010.504343 Vis sammendrag

  The creative class thesis put forward by Florida [(2002a) The Rise of the Creative Class and How it's transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life (New York: Basic Books)] has in recent years been subject to vivid debate and criticism. This article applies the creative class thesis onto a Nordic context in order to examine whether Florida's theory proves fruitful in a context different from the US. Based on qualitative data, the paper analyses the role of people climate and business climate for the location of the creative class and firms in three different kinds of regions in four Nordic countries. The analyses demonstrate that the people climate tends to be of secondary importance to the business climate in explaining the location of the Nordic creative class. This should be seen as a result of the urban hierarchy within the Nordic countries as well as a strong welfare policy, which ensures an equal distribution of public provision and supports dual career households. Together, these factors diminish the role of people climate for location choices. The study also finds that the notion of people climate has different meanings in various places, and what attracts or repels the creative class depends on the life phases of the members of the creative class. The study raises concerns about the potential for applying the creative class approach beyond large city regions, which limits its usability in regional planning.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Bugge, Markus (2009). Creative distraction: The digital transformation of the advertising industry. Uppsala universitet.  ISBN 978-91-506-2108-2.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Bugge, Markus (2020). (How) do we enable transformative innovation in the public sector?.
• Bugge, Markus (2020). Forutsetninger for en grønn og innovativ avfallslogistikk.
• Bugge, Markus; Andersen, Allan Dahl & Steen, Markus (2020). Multi-scalar directionality in mission-oriented innovation policies - A ferrytale from green maritime.
• Steen, Markus; Hansen, Teis; Bugge, Markus; Finne, Håkon & Ullern, Eli Fyhn (2020). Policy mixes for regional green growth.
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Bugge, Markus & Wennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2020). Organization of teaching and learning with 1:1 digital devices.
• Andersen, Allan Dahl; Bugge, Markus; Capasso, Marco; Jolly, Suyash; Klitkou, Antje; Sotarauta, Markku; Steen, Markus & Suvinen, Nina (2019). Green growth in Nordic regions : Eight case studies. NIFU Arbeidsnotat. 7. Vis sammendrag

  This working paper is an outcome of the research project “Where does the green economy grow? The Geography of Nordic Sustainability Transitions (GONST)”, funded by the Nordic Green Growth Research and Innovation Programme (appli-cation number 83130). The project started in 2017 is to be finalised in 2020.

• Bugge, Markus (2019). Innovasjon i avfallshåndtering - Resirkulering eller forebygging?.
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Multi-level directionality in mission-oriented innovation - A ferrytale from green maritime.
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Organisering for innovasjon - Er offentlig sektor rigget for det grønne skiftet?.
• Bugge, Markus (2019). Understanding the Bioeconomy.
• Bugge, Markus; Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje (2019). Er offentlig sektor rigget for det grønne skiftet?. Stat og styring.  ISSN 0803-0103.  29(3), s 20- 23 Vis sammendrag

  Silotenkning og manglende koordinering på tvers av offentlig og privat sektor er anerkjente svakheter ved et byråkratisk styringsregime. Disse svakhetene kan hindre Oslo kommune i å oppnå sine ambisiøse miljøpolitiske mål.

• Bugge, Markus; Hatløy, Anne; Halvorsen, Tor; Kebede, Tewodros Aragie; Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard & Van den Bergh, Graziella (2019). The need for demand and local anchoring of innovations.
• Røste, Rannveig & Bugge, Markus (2019). "Mission-oriented innovation policy on the ground: co-evolving in the interplay of public, private and civic actors".
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Szulecka, Julia (2019). Koordineringsutfordringer i politikken for bioøkonomien.
• Szulecka, Julia; Bugge, Markus & Scordato, Lisa (2019). Bioøkonomi - men hvordan? Koordineringsutfordringer.
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Bugge, Markus & Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2019). Digital læring i askerskolen : Sluttrapport fra følgeforskning. NIFU-rapport. 27. Vis sammendrag

  I perioden 2017–2019 gjennomførte Asker kommune prosjektet «Digital læring i Askerskolen». Satsingen innebar at alle elever fikk hver sin digitale enhet; en Chromebook til bruk i læring og undervisning. Som en del av satsingen iverksatte kommunen også et felles kompetanseløft for alle lærerne. NIFU har vært engasjert av kommunen for å gi svar på om satsingen har bidratt til bedre læring for elevene.

• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Vennerød, Frida Felicia & Bugge, Markus (2019). Hvorfor skal vi ha nettbrett i skolen?. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).  ISSN 0804-3116.
• Bugge, Markus (2018). Future studies of policies for research and innovation.
• Bugge, Markus (2018). Innovation in an SDG context. Sustainable innovations: Drivers, dilemmas and goals.
• Bugge, Markus; Dybdahl, Linn Meidell & Szulecka, Julia (2018). NIFU Insight 2018:1. Recycling or prevention of waste?Addressing the food waste challenge in the right end (SusValueWaste Policy Brief no. 2).
• Gregg, Jay Sterling; Happel, Maaike Karlijn; Bolwig, Simon; Bugge, Markus; Tanner, Anne & Klitkou, Antje (2018). The value chain for valorisation of organic waste in promotion of a circular bioeconomy: A literature review.
• Røste, Rannveig; Bugge, Markus & Dybdahl, Linn Meidell (2018). Grand challenges on the ground: Exploring governance dynamics in sustainability transitions.
• Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard; Wollscheid, Sabine; Bugge, Markus & Vennerød-Diesen, Frida Felicia (2018). Digital læring i askerskolen : Midtveisrapport fra følgeforskning. NIFU-rapport. 29. Vis sammendrag

  I perioden 2017-2019 gjennomfører Asker kommune prosjektet «Digital læring i askerskolen». Prosjektet omfatter implementering av 1:1 dekning av Chromebooks for alle kommunens skoler og herunder et større kompetanseløft for alle kommunens lærere. NIFU skal følge prosjektet med et følgeforskningsdesign. Datagrunnlaget omfatter skoleeier, skoleledelse, lærere og elever. Denne midtveisrapporten gir et bilde av satsingens første halvannet år.

• Bugge, Markus (2017). Hvordan kan bioøkonomien forstås som et systemskift? Bioøkonomien i et bredere perspektiv.
• Bugge, Markus (2017, 12. desember). Hvorfor vokser Norge? Paneldebatt om norsk verdiskapning og innovasjon. [Internett].  Deloitte.
• Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2017). Privat eller offentlig søppeldrift?. Klassekampen.  ISSN 0805-3839.  s 24- 24
• Normann, Håkon Endresen & Bugge, Markus (2017). Politikk uten prioriteringer. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  40(2), s 4- 5
• Siddiq, Fazilat; Bugge, Markus; Ulriksen, Robin & Tømte, Cathrine Edelhard (2017). Matematikk på nye måter : Erfaringer fra pilotering av Dragonbox ved 10 skoler i Skedsmo kommune. NIFU-rapport. 17. Vis sammendrag

  Denne rapporten presenterer resultatene fra følgeevalueringen av Dragonbox – et heldigitalt læreverk for å fremme tallforståelse i begynneropplæringen i pilotåret 2016/2017. Formålet har vært å belyse flere sider ved implementeringen av læreverket, slik som organiseringen av uttestingen, opplevelsen av implementeringen hos de involverte aktørene, samt brukertilfredshet og erfaringer med læreverket.

• Bugge, Markus (2016). Forskning og Innovasjon.
• Bugge, Markus (2016). From Grand Challenges to Daily Practice: The policy conditions for transformational change.
• Bugge, Markus; Klitkou, Antje & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Transition to sustainable urban waste management.
• Bugge, Markus & Skogli, Erland (2016). Spredning av innovative offentlige anskaffelser i norske kommuner.
• Bugge, Markus & Smith, Keith (2016). Facing the Grand Challenges: Health and Ageing, Climate and Energy.
• Bugge, Markus; Wollscheid, Sabine & Stensaker, Bjørn (2016). Evaluering av Kunnskapssenter for utdanning. NIFU-rapport. 12.
• Klitkou, Antje; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Action space in transition to sustainable urban waste management.
• Klitkou, Antje; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Action space in transition to sustainable urban waste management.
• Klitkou, Antje; Bugge, Markus & Hansen, Teis (2016). Competing visions for the transition to the bioeconomy.
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Deconstructing the policy discourse: Contending visions of the bio-based economy.
• Scordato, Lisa; Bugge, Markus & Fevolden, Arne Martin (2016). Governance in transition: directionality and heterogeneity towards a bioeconomy.
• Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars & Branstad, Are (2015). A co-evolutionary approach to transformative change in health care – The case of active ageing.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). A co-evolutionary approach to transformative change in health care – The case of active ageing.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). A co-evolutionary approach to transformative change in health care – The case of active ageing.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). Kunnskapens begrensninger.
• Bugge, Markus (2015). Måling av forskningens samfunnseffekter. Forskningspolitikk.  ISSN 0333-0273.  38(2)
• Bugge, Markus (2015). Velferdsteknologi, utvikling og samhandling - Relasjon mellom bruker, kommune og leverandør.
• Bugge, Markus & Seland, Idunn (2015). Å måle seg inn i et hjørne. Dagsavisen.  ISSN 1503-2892.  s 6- 6
• Bugge, Markus & Skogli, Erland (2015). Hvordan fremme innovasjon i kommunale anskaffelser?.
• Bugge, Markus (2014). Kunnskapens begrensninger. Stat og styring.  ISSN 0803-0103.  (04), s 10- 13 . doi: http://www.idunn.no/stat/2014/04/kunnskapens_begrensninger_
• Sivertsen, Gunnar; Piro, Fredrik Niclas; Bugge, Markus; Fevolden, Arne Martin; Solberg, Espen & Wiig, Ole (2014). Monitoreringssystem for forskning og innovasjon innen helse og omsorg: Et forprosjekt for å undersøke mulighetene. NIFU Arbeidsnotat. 9.
• Asheim, Bjørn Terje; Bugge, Markus; Coenen, Lars & Herstad, Sverre Johan (2013). What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring To The Policy Table? Reconceptualising regional innovation systems. Circle Working Paper. 5.
• Bugge, Markus; Herstad, Sverre Johan; Coenen, Lars & Asheim, Bjørn Terje (2013). What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Re-considering regional innovation policy.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Hvordan orkestrere kunnskap for en innovativ Osloregion?.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Innovasjon i offentlige organisasjoner.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Re-cycling knowledge: How do modern societies and economies evolve through technological change and innovation?.
• Bugge, Markus (2013). Refleksjoner rundt forskerrollen.
• Bugge, Markus; Solberg, Espen; Fridholm, Tobias & Sivertsen, Gunnar (2013). Kunnskap i system: En kartlegging av kunnskapsfunksjonen på det arbeids- og velferdspolitiske området i Sverige, Danmark og Canada. NIFU-rapport. 47.
• Bugge, Markus; Solberg, Espen & Wilhelmsen, Lars (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013 (EPSIS), I: Espen Solberg & Kaja Kathrine Wendt (red.),  Det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet - statistikk og indikatorer 2013.  Norges forskningsråd.  ISBN 978821203238-5.  Fokusboks nr. 1.1.  s 29 - 29
• Herstad, Sverre Johan; Asheim, Bjørn Terje; Bugge, Markus & Coenen, Lars (2012). What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring To The Policy Table? Reconceptualising regional innovation systems.
• Bloch, Carter & Bugge, Markus (2012). Public sector innovation - from theory to measurement.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Digitalisering av reklamebransjen.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Fra budskap til tjeneste.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Innovasjon i offentlig sektor satt i kontekst.
• Bugge, Markus (2012). Innovasjon i offentlige organisasjoner.
• Bugge, Markus & Skålholt, Asgeir (2012). Co-creation for Public Sector Innovation.
• Bugge, Markus (2011). Co-creating Oslo: Fra næringsklynger til kunnskapsplattformer for en innovativ Osloregion.
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen; Mortensen, Peter S. & Bloch, Carter (2011). Measuring Public Innovation in Nordic Countries: Report on the Nordic Pilot studies - Analyses of methodelogy and results. NIFU-rapport. 40.
• Foyn, Frank; Wilhelmsen, Lars & Bugge, Markus (2011). Innovasjon i offentlig sektor - kunnskapsgrunnlaget for en mer effektiv og strategisk offentlig sektor i Norden, I: Kaja Kathrine Wendt (red.),  Det norske forsknings- og innovasjonssystemet - statistikk og indikatorer 2011.  Norges forskningsråd.  ISBN 978-82-12-02965-1.  Fokusboks 2.9.  s 129 - 130
• Borgen, Jorunn Spord; Bugge, Markus & Lund, Jørgen (2010). Samspill om kunst i offentlig rom : evaluering av innkjøpsordningen for statlige leiebygg og eldre statsbygg i perioden 1997-2000. NIFU STEP rapport. 19.
• Bugge, Markus (2010). Jacobian cluster mutation across advertising and internet-based market communication.
• Bugge, Markus (2010). Measuring innovation in the public sector.
• Bugge, Markus Michaelsen & Herstad, Sverre Johan (2010). Gjenbruk oljekunnskapen. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).  ISSN 0804-3116.
• Bugge, Markus; Eide, Lars; Grünfeld, Leo A. & Thune, Taran Mari (2010). Brukerstyrte innovasjonsprosjekter og samfunnsøkonomisk avkastning.
• Bugge, Markus; Godø, Helge Lauritz; Midttun, Atle; Pedersen, Trond Einar & Spilling, Olav R. (2010). FoU for en grønn energisektor: Analyser av innovasjons- og kommersialiseringsstrategier i åtte FMEer - Forskningssentre for Miljøvennlig Energi. NIFU STEP rapport. 11.
• Bugge, Markus; Hauknes, Johan; Bloch, Carter & Slipersæter, Stig (2010). Measuring innovation in the public sector: I rapporten: Measuring Innovation in the Public Sector.
• Bugge, Markus; Hauknes, Johan; Bloch, Carter & Slipersæter, Stig (2010). The Public Sector in Innovation Systems : Module1 - Conceptual Framework.
• Grünfeld, Leo A.; Bugge, Markus & Kaloudis, Aris (2010). Innovasjon i tjenester: En empirisk analyse av tjenesteinnovasjon i norsk næringsliv og innovasjonspolitikkens utfordringer. Menon-publikasjon.  (12)
• Solum, Nils Henrik & Bugge, Markus (2008). Innføring av digitalkino i Norge: Evaluering av del 2 av de digitale forsøksprosjektene NDA og NORDIC. Sluttrapport. NIFU STEP rapport. 37.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin