Cathrine Holst

• Christensen, Johan & Holst, Cathrine (2020). How Do Advocacy Think Tanks Relate to Academic Knowledge? The Case of Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies.  ISSN 0080-6757. . doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12184
• Christensen, Johan & Holst, Cathrine (2020). The Europeanization of national knowledge regimes, In Vigjilenca Abazi; Johan Adriaensen & Thomas Christiansen (ed.),  The Contestation of Expertise in the European Union.  Palgrave Macmillan.  ISBN 978-3-030-54366-2.  Kapittel.
• Holst, Cathrine (2020). Ekspertkunnskap og politikkutforming, I: Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi (red.),  Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi årbok 2019.  Novus Forlag.  ISBN 9788270999149.  Kapittel.  s 252 - 232
• Holst, Cathrine (2020). Fra Helga Hernes til #metoo. Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning.  ISSN 0809-6341.  (1) . doi: 10.18261/issn.1891-1781-2020-01-06 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine (2020). Når samfunnsforskere anbefaler politikk. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning.  ISSN 0040-716X.  (1) . doi: 10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2020-01-08 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine & Moe, Hallvard (2020). Deliberative systems theory and citizens’ use of online media: testing a critical theory of democracy on a high achiever. Political Studies.  ISSN 0032-3217. . doi: 10.1177/0032321719890809 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine & Molander, Anders (2020). Epistemic Worries about Economic Expertise, In John Erik Fossum & Jozef Batora (ed.),  Towards a Segmented European Political Order. The European Union's Post-crises Conundrum.  Routledge.  ISBN 9781138495333.  Kapittel 4.  s 72 - 92 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Krick, Eva & Holst, Cathrine (2020). Governance by hybrid advisory committees - a hallmark of social democracy?. Comparative Social Research.  ISSN 0195-6310.  35
• Henrik, Friberg-Fernros; Johan, Karlsson Schaffer & Holst, Cathrine (2019). Deliberation after consensus. Journal of Public Deliberation.  ISSN 1937-2841.  15(1) . doi: 10.16997/jdd.325 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Ekspertenes rolle i demokratiet, I:  Årbok 2018. Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi.  Novus Forlag.  ISBN 9788270999217.  Kapittel. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Ekspertifisering og europeisering i norske likestillingsutredninger, I: Cathrine Holst; Hege Skjeie & Mari Teigen (red.),  Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk.  Gyldendal Akademisk.  ISBN 978-82-05-42704-4.  Kapittel 7.  s 149 - 169
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Hva er en god NOU?. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift.  ISSN 0800-336X.  (4), s 344- 351 . doi: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3053-2019-04-05 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Marx' kritikk av ekspertkunnskap, I: Christoffer Conrad Eriksen (red.),  Den unge Marx: Rett, samfunn og vitenskapsteori.  Cappelen Damm Akademisk.  ISBN 9788202588076.  4.  s 149 - 174
• Holst, Cathrine & Molander, Anders (2019). Epistemic democracy and the role of experts. Contemporary Political Theory.  ISSN 1470-8914.  18(4), s 541- 561 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-00299-4 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Holst, Cathrine & Molander, Anders (2019). Jon Elster, In  SAGE Research Methods Foundations.  Sage Publications.  ISBN 9781473965003.  Pioneers.
• Holst, Cathrine; Skjeie, Hege & Teigen, Mari (2019). Likestillingspolitikk og europeisk integrasjon, I: Cathrine Holst; Hege Skjeie & Mari Teigen (red.),  Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk.  Gyldendal Akademisk.  ISBN 978-82-05-42704-4.  1.  s 11 - 34 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  Kapittelet gir en innføring i likestillingspolitikk i Norden og Europa og undersøker fem forventninger om forholdet mellom europeisk integrasjon og nordisk likestillingspolitikk. 1. Stemmer oppfatningen om at nordisk likestillingspolitikk generelt er lite påvirket av EU; 2. Når EU påvirker likestillingspolitikken - er det til det verre?; 3. Er de nordiske landene som er med i EU, mer påvirket av EU enn lans som er blitt stående utenfor?; 4. Samarbeider de nordiske landene for å påvirke EUs likestillingspolitikk?; 5. EUs likestillingspolitikk er blitt beskrevet som stadig mer flerdimensjonal, nyliberal, rettsliggjort og med et demokratisk underskudd. Ser vi spor av slike utviklingstrekk i hvordan EU har påvirket nordisk likestillingspolitikk?

• Krick, Eva; Christensen, Johan & Holst, Cathrine (2019). Between ‘scientisation’ and a ‘participatory turn’. Tracing shifts in the governance of policy advice.. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  46(6), s 927- 939 . doi: 10.1093/scipol/scz040 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Krick, Eva & Holst, Cathrine (2019). The socio-political ties of expert bodies. How to reconcile the independence requirement of reliable expertise and the responsiveness requirement of democratic governance, In Eva Krick & Cathrine Holst (ed.),  Experts and Democratic Legitimacy. Tracing the Social Ties of Expert Bodies in Europe.  Routledge.  ISBN 9780367427535.  Chapter 1. Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Skjeie, Hege; Holst, Cathrine & Teigen, Mari (2019). Helt isolert? Hvordan Norge påvirkes av - og selv påvirker - EUs likestillingspolitikk, I: Cathrine Holst; Hege Skjeie & Mari Teigen (red.),  Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk.  Gyldendal Akademisk.  ISBN 978-82-05-42704-4.  10.  s 218 - 237 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  I dette kapittelet behandler vi systematisk EUs betydning for endirnger i norsk likestillingspolitikk fra midten av 1990-årene. Diskusjonen er inspirert av europeiseringsteori, som vektlegger hvordan ideer og politikk fra EU-nivå filtreres gjennom nasjoanale og locale meningsrammer, men også hvordan normer og tiltak på reise fra Europa kan transformers til ressurser for å sette dagsorden nasjonalt.

• Skjeie, Hege; Holst, Cathrine & Teigen, Mari (2019). Splendid Isolation? On How a Non-member Is Affected by — And Affects — EU Gender Equality Policy, In Moira Dustin; Nuno Ferreira & Susan Millns (ed.),  Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit.  Palgrave Macmillan.  ISBN 978-3-030-03122-0.  Kapittel 17.  s 439 - 461 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (2018). Introduction: Democracy, Institutional Compatibility and Change, In Fredrik Engelstad; Cathrine Holst & Gunnar C. Aakvaag (ed.),  Democratic State and Democratic Society.  De Gruyter Open.  ISBN 978-3-11-063407-5.  Chapter 1.  s 1 - 21
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Afterword: Varieties of Expertisation, In Cathrine Holst; Marta Warat & Magdalena Góra (ed.),  Expertisation and Democracy in Europe.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-1138288232.  Afterword.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Kjønn, feminisme og vitenskap, I: Ståle Gundersen; Tarjei Mandt Larsen & Cato Wittusen (red.),  Utvalgte filosofiske emner til EXPHIL.  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 978-82-15-03125-5.  7.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Kjønn, feminisme og vitenskap, I: Susanna Maria Solli & Eivind Balsvik (red.),  Introduksjon til samfunnsvitenskapene; Bind 2. (3. utgave).  Universitetsforlaget.  ISBN 978-82-15-02966-5.  Kapittel.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Promoting Global Justice When Backlash Strikes: EU and UN Beijing +20. GLOBUS Research Papers.  ISSN 2535-2504.  2018(7) . doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3184285 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv. Vis sammendrag

  The UN Beijing World Conference on Women in 1995 was a landmark event resulting in the famous Beijing Declaration and Platform of Action. In 2015, a review of the implementation of the 1995 Beijing agenda — Beijing 20 — was conducted by the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), culminating in a CSW conference in New York. Equipped with a typology of three global justice conceptions—global justice as non-domination, as impartiality, and as mutual recognition — the paper utilises publicly available documents, media reports, and interviews with civil society representatives and gender experts, to identify underlying normative ideas of the Beijing 20 process and the EU’s approach. A comparison is made with the process and the global justice conceptions central to the Beijing Declaration and the EU’s role at the Beijing World Conference. Findings show that the EU’s role as a promoter of impartial global justice was limited in the Beijing 20 process, and that justice as non-domination prevails as a strong organising principle. This represents a shift from the original Beijing path that arguably had a firmer basis in ideas of justice as impartiality. Also the noteworthy commitment to global justice as mutual recognition, which charac-terised both the Beijing 1995 documents and the processes in which they came about, was far less pronounced twenty years later, despite the EU’s declared ambitions to include civil society and ally with women’s rights advocates. These troublesome develop-ments likely reflect a global political climate that is less gender equality friendly, and where established lines between low and high salience are becoming more unclear. This can potentially, and perhaps increasingly, turn gender policy into ‘big politics’. In ad-dition, the EU’s ability and motivation to act as a progressive entrepreneur in the gender equality area may be diminishing as a result of internal developments in the Union.

• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Scandinavian Feminism and Gender Partnership, In Nina Witoszek & Atle Midttun (ed.),  Sustainable Modernity: The Nordic Model and Beyond.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-1138718210.  Kapittel 6.  s 102 - 118
• Holst, Cathrine; Góra, Magdalena & Warat, Marta (2018). Introduction: Expertisation and Democracy in Europe, In Cathrine Holst; Marta Warat & Magdalena Góra (ed.),  Expertisation and Democracy in Europe.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-1138288232.  Intro.
• Holst, Cathrine & Krick, Eva (2018). Committee Governance in Consensus Cultures: An Exploration of Best Practice Cases in Germany and Norway, In Fredrik Engelstad; Cathrine Holst & Gunnar C. Aakvaag (ed.),  Democratic State and Democratic Society.  De Gruyter Open.  ISBN 978-3-11-063407-5.  Kapittel 7.  s 151 - 174
• Holst, Cathrine & Molander, Anders (2018). Asymmetry, disagreement and biases: epistemic worries about expertise. Social Epistemology.  ISSN 0269-1728.  32(6), s 358- 371 . doi: 10.1080/02691728.2018.1546348 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Krick, Eva & Holst, Cathrine (2018). The socio-political ties of expert bodies. How to reconcile the independence requirement of reliable expertise and the responsiveness requirement of democratic governance. European Politics and Society.  ISSN 2374-5118. . doi: 10.1080/23745118.2018.1515866 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.
• Seibicke, Helena & Holst, Cathrine (2018). Unpacking Gender Expertise: The Case of the European Women’s Lobby, In Cathrine Holst; Marta Warat & Magdalena Góra (ed.),  Expertisation and Democracy in Europe.  Routledge.  ISBN 978-1138288232.  7.
• Christensen, Johan & Holst, Cathrine (2017). Advisory Commissions, Academic Expertise and Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Norway. Science and Public Policy.  ISSN 0302-3427.  44(6), s 821- 833 . doi: 10.1093/scipol/scx016 Fulltekst i vitenarkiv.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Holst, Cathrine; Skjeie, Hege & Teigen, Mari (red.) (2019). Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk. Gyldendal Akademisk.  ISBN 978-82-05-42704-4.  249 s. Vis sammendrag

  De nordiske landene omtales ofte som "en likestillingsmodell". De gjør det godt i internasjonale sammenligninger av likestillingsutvikling - og har en politisk kultur og en velferdsstatsmodell som fremmer likestilling i arbeidsliv og politikk. Vi undersøker i denne boka hvordan europeisk integrasjon har endret nordisk likestillingspolitikk - og hva som ikke har endret seg. Samtidig som vi spør i hvor stor grad Norden har satt sitt preg på EUs likestillingspolitikk. En hovedkonklusjon er at EU har hatt større innflytelse på norsk likestillingspolitikk enn mange tror, ikke minst ved å utfordre og bidra til å utvikle likestilling som rettighet. Slik har europeisk integrasjon også utfordret det etablerte sosialdemokratiske synes på likestilling i samfunnet.

• Krick, Eva & Holst, Cathrine (ed.) (2019). Experts and Democratic Legitimacy. Tracing the Social Ties of Expert Bodies in Europe. Routledge.  ISBN 9780367427535.  136 s. Vis sammendrag

  Experts and Democratic Legitimacy challenges the technocratic reading of expert bodies, such as central banks, advisory committees and regulatory agencies. Expert contributors ask in what way expert bodies are subject to some of the key pressures in contemporary governance, such as democratisation, politicisation and expertisation. Based on empirical studies, the book traces the multiple social ties of expert bodies and refines the common perception of expert bodies as ‘de-politicised’ institutions that are detached from political interference and societal input. It further theorises the tension and reconcilability between reliable, independent expert knowledge on the one hand and the need for accountability and legitimacy in modern policy-making on the other hand. Refining the detached, de-politicised image of non-majoritarian institutions, Experts and Democratic Legitimacy will be of great interest to scholars of European studies, political and social theory, modern governance and policy-making. This book was originally published as a special issue of European Politics and Society.

• Engelstad, Fredrik; Holst, Cathrine & Aakvaag, Gunnar C. (ed.) (2018). Democratic State and Democratic Society. De Gruyter Open.  ISBN 978-3-11-063407-5.  403 s.
• Holst, Cathrine; Warat, Marta & Góra, Magdalena (ed.) (2018). Expertisation and Democracy in Europe. Routledge.  ISBN 978-1138288232.  230 s. Vis sammendrag

  Expertisation and Democracy in Europe provides a much-needed account of the role and re-organisation of expertise and expert knowledge in Europe and the European Union in a broad range of policy spheres, contributing to the debate triggered by the recent crises. It brings novel perspectives to debates on technocracy and our understanding of the relations between knowledge, experts and democracy. The book explores and assesses new and old linkages between knowledge, expertise and democracy, and expands and deepens the current debates by addressing questions such as: What is the role of expertise in Europe? How is knowledge of different kinds embedded in and decisive for democratic practice in contemporary democracies? How are we to assess recent transformations of the expert-citizens and government-civil society relationships from the perspective of democracy, and which paths are viable in the years to come? Finally, the book engages with and gives flesh to the notion of expertisation not only as a broad political and societal diagnosis, but also as a multidimensional and deeply contested process that enfolds in concrete practices and institutional settings.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin

• Holst, Cathrine (2020, 17. januar). Intervju med Dag og Tid om NOU-ene.  Dag og Tid.
• Holst, Cathrine (2020). Krig og litteratur: Ondskapens banalitet. Samtale med Arne Johan Vetlesen om Hannah Arendt.
• Holst, Cathrine (2020). Likestilling i et flerkulturelt Europa.
• Holst, Cathrine & Teigen, Mari (2020). Addressing the ‘Boy Problem’ in Sweden and Norway: Evidence and Ideology.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Asymmetry, Disagreement and Biases: Epistemic Worries About Expertise and How to Address Them.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Deliberative systems theory and online media use.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Deliberative systems theory and online media: testing a critical theory of democracy on a high achiever.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Democratic and epistemic worries about expertise.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Descriptive Representation in International Courts.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Distributive justice or participatory parity?.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Drug policy, policy-making and democratic legitimacy.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019, 09. april). EU og likestilling. [Internett].  KILDEN.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Ekspertene kommer. Om kunnskapsbasert politikk.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Eksperter i politikken.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Ekspertkunnskap og gode samfunnsbeslutninger.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Epistemic and democratic worries over expertise.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Europeisering av nordisk likestillingspolitikk.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Expertization of policy-making - good or bad?.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Gender Equality and the Law: Comments to a framework paper on Nordic gender equality law.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Global Gender Justice: Distributive Justice or Participatory Parity?. GLOBUS Research Papers. 1.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). "Gutteproblemet" og Stoltenberg-utvalget i et NOU-perspektiv: en tentativ analyse.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019, 07. oktober). Interview with European Platform of Women Scientists. [Internett].  European Platform of Women Scientists.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Kritikk uten politikk. Anmeldelse av Capitalism (2018) av Nancy Fraser og Rahel Jaeggi. Agora : Journal for metafysisk spekulasjon.  ISSN 0800-7136.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Lovutforming i et samfunnsvitenskapelig perspektiv.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Marx' kritikk av ekspertkunnskap.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Nordic Gender Equality Law.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Politikk i dystre tider. Morgenbladet.  ISSN 0805-3847.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Politikk i dystre tider. Hannah Arendt.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Scientization of policy-advice?.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Spania og Norge: Kommentar på lansering av bok om den spanske borgerkrig og Norge av Bernt Hagtevdt m.fl.
• Holst, Cathrine (2019). Vitenskapens normer.
• Holst, Cathrine & Christensen, Johan (2019). Expertization of policy-making. Bridging the gap between normative theory and empirical analysis.
• Holst, Cathrine & Isungset, Martin Arstad (2019). Presentasjon av NOU-studie for forskergruppa Social Inequality and Population Dynamics (SIPD).
• Holst, Cathrine & Krick, Eva (2019). Committee governance in consensus democracies.
• Christensen, Johan & Holst, Cathrine (2018). The Role of Experts in Policy-Making: Bridging the Gap Between Normative Theory and Empirical Analysis. Vis sammendrag

  While scholarship on the role of experts in policy-making is growing rapidly, a disconnect is visible in the literature. On the one hand, there are sweeping diagnoses of ‘technocracy’ or ‘epistocracy’. These grand diagnoses often lack a clear empirical basis and disregard the conflicting realities on the ground. And they assess expertization as either good – typically for decision quality – or bad – typically for democracy, disregarding the complex task of normative justification under conditions of reasonable pluralism. On the other hand, empirical studies of the involvement of experts in policy-making often allude to the implications for democracy but rarely address this issue in more than a cursory way. The paper seeks to bridge this gap between normative theory and empirical analysis. Based on different reasonable conceptions of democracy, it develops indicators of legitimate expert involvement in policy-making that can be assessed empirically. These indicators are applied to the involvement of experts in policy formulation through advisory bodies. The paper analyzes an extensive new dataset of Norwegian ad hoc advisory commissions appointed by government covering the period 1972-2016 and including about 1500 advisory commissions.

• Holst, Cathrine (2018). A comment to "Agents seeking principals – the role of policy intermediaries in corporate political Activity".
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Asymmetry, disagreement and biases.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Asymmetry, disgareement and biases.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). EU og nordisk likestilllingspolitikk.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Ekspertenes inntog. Når forskere lager politikk.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Ekspertenes rolle i demokratiet.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Epistemic worries over the political role of expertise.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Er det eksperter vi er? Om samfunnsforskerens ulike rolle.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Helga Hernes, feminisme og sosialdemokrati.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Knowledge-Based Policy-Making? A Coversation with Cass Sunstein and Anine Kierulf.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018, 06. desember). Kunnskapsbasert politikkutforming – en samtale med Cass Sunstein. [Fagblad].  Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Kvalitative metoder i politikkutforming.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Makt- og demokratiutredningen – treffer analysen 15 år etter? Kommentar til Øyvind Østerud.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Maktutredningen 15 år etter. En kommentar til Øyvind Østerud.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Norske offentlige utredninger mellom fag og politikk. Samtale med Grete Brochmann og Anne Lise Ellingsæter.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Offentlige utredninger i politikkutforming.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Om eksperter i offentlige utredninger.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Promoting global justice when backlash strikes: the Beijing consensus on gender equality – and what happened to it. Global Justice Blog.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Scandinavian Feminism and Gender Partnership.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). The role of academic knowledge in Norwegian think tanks.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Theorising from experience. Comment to Louis McNay.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Trust in Science. A Comment to Susan Owens.
• Holst, Cathrine (2018). Vi som elsker Europa. Innlegg i paneldebatt om ny bok av Sten Inge Jørgensen.
• Holst, Cathrine & Christensen, Johan (2018). Panel: Tracing Expertization. Vis sammendrag

  Abstract It is often claimed that governance relies increasingly on academic experts and expertise, what can be referred to as the expertization or scientization of policy-making. But to what extent is this grand diagnosis confirmed by empirical data? Is expertization really taking place, and how does it stand up against competing trends such as the politicization of policy-making or the democratization of knowledge? The panel investigates these issues by examining expertization processes over time within different advisory bodies. It raises the question of how such processes can be properly conceptualized, mapped and compared across countries, institutional settings and policy areas. The changing reliance on academic expertise is traced using both quantitative and qualitative data. The panel also explores the empirical trends in light of normative debates on technocracy and de-politicized decision-making.

• Holst, Cathrine & Christensen, Johan (2018). The role of experts in policy-making. Bridging the gap between normative theory and empirical scholarship.
• Holst, Cathrine & Christensen, Johan (2018). The role of experts in policy-making: Bridging the gap between normative theory and empirical analysis.
• Holst, Cathrine & Langvatn, Silje Aambø (2018). Accountability of experts - is it what we need?.
• Holst, Cathrine & Langvatn, Silje Aambø (2018). Accountability of experts: What does it mean, why is it challenging - and is it what we need?.
• Holst, Cathrine & Lyngstad, Torkild Hovde (2018). Årets sosiolog 2018 - Nils Petter Gleditsch. sosiologen.no.

Se alle arbeider i Cristin