The demographics of assisted reproductive technology births in a Nordic country

Alice Goisis, Siri Eldevik Håberg, Hans Ivar Hanevik, Maria Christine Magnus & Øystein Kravdal

Front page of journal Human Reproduction

Photo: Oxford Academic

Published in:

Human Reproduction, Volume 35, June 2020

DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa055

Abstract:

STUDY QUESTION

What are the socio-demographic characteristics of families in Norway who have children after assisted reproductive technology (ART), and have these characteristics changed over time?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Parents who conceive through ART in Norway tend to be advantaged families, and their socio-demographic profile has not changed considerably over the period 1985–2014.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A small number of studies show that couples who conceive through ART tend to be socio-economically advantaged.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Norwegian Population Register, the Medical Birth Register and the national data bases were linked to study all live births in Norway between 1985 and 2014.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The sample consisted of 1 757 768 live births. Simple bivariate analyses were performed to describe the socio-demographic characteristics of parents who conceived through ART and changes in these characteristics over the time period 1985–2014. We used linear probability models to estimate the association between parental income and giving birth after ART from 2000 to 2014, before and after adjustment for maternal age at delivery, education and area of residence.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Parents conceiving through ART were more likely to be older, with the highest levels of income and education, and married. Their socio-demographic profiles did not change considerably during the period 1985–2014. In the unadjusted model, parents belonging to the top income quartile were 4.2 percentage points more likely (95% CI: 4.1 to 4.3) to have conceived through ART than parents who belonged to the bottom income quartile. Adjustment for maternal age only partially reduced the income disparities (for the top income quartile by 35% (β = 2.7 with 95% CI: 2.5 to 2.8)). Additional adjustment for maternal education, marital status and area of residence did not further attenuate the associations.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The data does not enable us to tell whether the lower numbers of children conceived through ART amongst more disadvantaged individuals is caused by lower success rates with ART treatment, lower demand of ART services or barriers faced in access to ART. The study focuses on Norway, a context characterised by high subsidisation of ART services.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Even though in Norway access to ART services is highly subsidised, the results highlight important and persisting social inequities in use of ART. The results also indicate that children born after ART grow up in resourceful environments, which will benefit their development and well-being.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by European Research Council agreement n. 803959 (to A.G.), by Economic and Social Research Council grant ES/M001660/1 and by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 262700. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Published Aug. 20, 2020 4:13 PM - Last modified Nov. 17, 2020 2:12 PM