Curbing corporate debt bias: Do limitations to interest deductibility work?

Ruud De Mooij & Shafik Hebous

Photo: Journal of Banking & Finance

Published in:

Journal of Banking & Finance, Volume 96, July 2018.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.013


Tax provisions favoring corporate debt over equity finance (“debt bias”) are widely recognized as a risk to financial stability. This paper explores whether and how thin-capitalization rules, which restrict interest deductibility beyond a certain amount, affect corporate debt ratios and mitigate corporate default risk. We find that rules targeted at related party borrowing (the majority of today's rules) have no significant impact on debt bias, as they do not affect third party borrowing. These rules also have no effect on broader indicators of firm corporate distress. Rules applying to all debt, in contrast, turn out to be effective: the presence of such a rule reduces the debt-asset ratio in an average company by 5 percentage points; and they reduce the probability of a firm being in financial distress by 5 percent. Debt ratios are found to be more responsive to thin capitalization rules in industries characterized by a high share of tangible assets.

Published July 19, 2019 2:45 PM - Last modified July 19, 2019 2:45 PM