Trym Nohr Fjørtoft

Postdoctoral Fellow

Norwegian version of this page

Email t.n.fjortoft@arena.uio.no

Mobile phone +1 510-838-6351 +47 46 74 79 36

Username

Visiting address Gaustadalléen 30A Floor UE 0373 Oslo

Postal address ARENA Centre for European Studies P. O. Box 1143 Blindern N-0318 Oslo

Press photo Download business card

Academic interests

Fjørtoft is a postdoctoral researcher with the SINGLEMARKETS project. His academic interests include single-market governance, democracy, the legitimacy of unelected bodies, and border control and migration.

Background

Trym Nohr Fjørtoft holds a PhD in political science from the University of Oslo. He was a visiting researcher at the European University Institute in Florence in 2020. Fjørtoft has also been a seminar teacher in Political Philosophy and Introduction to Political Science at the University of Oslo.

Funding

Fjørtoft is part of the project "The Politics of European and American Single-Market Governance" (SINGLEMARKETS), funded by the Norwegian research council.

See his personal website for more information.

Tags: Democracy, Expertise, Legitimacy, European Union, USA

Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr & Sandven, Hallvard Hodne (2022). Symmetry in the Delegation of Power as a Legitimacy Criterion. Journal of Common Market Studies. ISSN 0021-9886. doi: 10.1111/jcms.13429. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
The EU's power is expanding, calling for reassessments of its normative legitimacy. This article proposes a novel criterion for assessing the EU's legitimacy: symmetry in the delegation of power. We illustrate the usefulness of this criterion through an analysis of the European border regime. Existing analyses of the border regime have tended to dismiss it as weak and intergovernmental. We show, to the contrary, that it is both strong and weak. The EU wields significant power in border control but lacks power altogether in immigration policy. This asymmetry has rendered the EU incapable of discharging the moral responsibilities that arise in migration control, posing a novel legitimacy challenge. Finally, we argue that the symmetry criterion generalizes and can shed light on the EU's legitimacy beyond the area of migration.
Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr & Michailidou, Asimina (2021). Beyond expertise: the public construction of legitimacy for EU agencies. Political Research Exchange (PRX). 3(1), p. 1–27. doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2021.2018266. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
How is the power of independent agencies legitimized? This is a central question in modern democratic societies. Earlier research has privileged technical expertise as the predominant source of legitimacy for such agencies. While recent contributions have challenged this assumption, we have seen few attempts to systematically analyze the conditions under which different sources of legitimacy are established in public discourse. We address this gap by proposing a conceptual framework of four legitimation arguments and test their prevalence through an empirical analysis of the public legitimation of EU agencies. We hypothesize that the prevalence of each argument depends on characteristics of the agency, especially its scientific ‘hardness’ and its public salience. We test our hypotheses in three steps. We first combine automated text classification and qualitative content analysis to analyze Swedish news media coverage of three EU agencies, 2005–2019. In a third step, we quantitatively analyze aggregated data on the Swedish news coverage of all EU agencies 2005–2019. We find more technical-expertise discourse in coverage of hard-science agencies, and more political-control discourse where agencies are ‘softer’ or more salient. Our findings are therefore relevant for ongoing normative and empirical discussions on the legitimacy of independent agencies.
Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr (2020). More power, more control: The legitimizing role of expertise in Frontex after the refugee crisis. Regulation & Governance. ISSN 1748-5983. doi: 10.1111/rego.12373. Full text in Research Archive Show summary
This article explores how the appeal to depoliticized expertise worked to legitimize increased supervisory and executive power to the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, Frontex, after the 2015 refugee crisis. Frontex is an EU agency operating in a highly salient field, removed from hard‐science “gold standards” of evidence, where member states have been reluctant to delegate power and sovereignty. Through a process‐tracing case study, this article finds that appeals to technical neutrality, quantification, and objective indicators nevertheless were central when a new mandate for the agency was negotiated, giving Frontex unprecedented supervisory and executive power. They were also important resources for member states concerned about Frontex's increased powers. By focusing on an agency at a remove from the natural‐science archetype, this article contributes to the literature on knowledge use in independent agencies. It suggests that technical expertise can be a powerful source of legitimacy even in a field removed from “hard” science.

View all works in Cristin

Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr (2020). Teknisk ekspertise kan være en politisk ressurs. Stat og styring. ISSN 0803-0103. 30(3), p. 12–15.
Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr (2019). Frontex, Expertise and the Refugee Crisis.
Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr (2018). The Role of Expertise in Frontex.
Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr (2022). Borders of Technocracy: Expertise, democracy, and the legitimacy of unelected bodies. Universitetet i Oslo. ISSN 1504-3991. Full text in Research Archive
Fjørtoft, Trym Nohr (2016). Coping or Hoping Mechanisms: Evaluating the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions. Universitetet i Oslo.