Nettsider med emneord «political science» - Side 2
Neil Ketchley presents Violence, Concessions, and Decolonization: Evidence from the 1919 Egyptian Revolution
The digitalization of records of political data, historical and current, has the potential to substantively enrich, and challenge, our understanding of political phenomena. The Political Data Science (PODS) research group brings together scholars interested in the collection and exploitation of these new sources of data.
Neil Ketchley presents Violent Contention and Decolonization: Evidence from the 1919 Egyptian Revolution
Course instructor: Jan Erling Klausen, Asbjørn Røiseland, Signy Irene Vabo
Course credits: 10 ECTS
Contact person: Mina Aasterud
Course instructor: Professor Jenny Andersson, CNRS, MaxPo; Sciences Po, Paris, France and Professor Klaus Petersen, Danish Centre for Welfare Studies, University of Southern Denmark
Course credits: 8 ECTS
Contact person: Sarah Younes
Course instructor: Professor Gita Steiner-Khamsi, Columbia University New York, USA and Professor Antoni Verger, Autonomous University Barcelona, Spain
Course credits: 8 ECTS
Contact person: Sarah Younes
Course instructor: Associate Professor Neal Caren, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Course credits: 8 ECTS
Contact person: Sarah Younes
Course instructor: Professor Andrew Bennett, Georgetown University, USA
Course credits: 8 ECTS
Contact person: Sarah Younes
Studiepoeng: 10 (anbefalte studiepoeng, disse må endelig godkjennes av institusjonen du er tatt opp ved)
In this paper, the authors confront some commonly held assumptions and objections with regard to the feasibility of deliberation in a transnational and plurilingual setting. To illustrate their argument, they rely on a solid set of both quantitative and qualitative data from Europolis, a transnational deliberative experiment that took place one week ahead of the 2009 European Parliamentary elections.
ARENA Working Paper 9/2011 (pdf)
Irena Fiket, Espen D. H. Olsen, Hans-Jörg Trenz
The paper suggests a practice turn in the analysis of political legitimacy. Current social science research on political legitimacy suffers twofold.
ARENA Working Paper 8/2011 (pdf)
Daniel Gaus
This paper shows that the main pattern of European democratisation has unfolded along the lines of an EU organised as a multilevel system of representative parliamentary government and not as a system of deliberative governance as the transnationalists propound.
ARENA Working Paper 5/2011 (pdf)
Erik Oddvar Eriksen and John Erik Fossum
Foundation, History, Main Objectives and Target Groups
The 21st Century Europe entails challenging processes of integration and disintegration. Integration radically challenges the social cohesion of old and new societies. European social science has so far largely been confined to the nation-state level.
In this paper De Wilde is discussing Euroscepticism. This paper observes that studies on Euroscepticism either focus on the positions of individual parties on issues of European integration or on the character of public discourse in different member states. The present study incorporates the qualities of both strands, using the method of claims-making analysis. This study shows how the budget and its costs featured prominently in Dutch party politics and how the importance of this issue fed and featured Euroscepticism.
ARENA Working Paper 03/2009 (pdf)
Pieter de Wilde
This paper discusses the usefulness of reflexive reason-giving as an approach to transnational and supranational systems of governance. It is argued that deliberation must be supplemented with law and trust as resources for collective action.
ARENA Working Paper 20/2004 (pdf)
Erik Oddvar Eriksen