Do non-enforceable contracts matter? Evidence from an international lab experiment

By: Erik Sørensen,  Alexander W. Cappelen, Rune Jansen Hagen and Bertil Tungodden

Published in:

Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 100-113, 2014.


Many verifiable contracts are impossible or difficult to enforce. This applies to contracts among family and friends, contracts regulating market transactions, and sovereign debt contracts. Do such non-enforceable contracts matter? We use a version of the trust game with participants from Norway and Tanzania to study repayment decisions in the presence of non-enforceable loan contracts. Our main finding is that the specific content of the contract has no effect on loan repayment. Rather, the borrowers seem to be motivated by other moral motives, which contributes to explaining why they partly fulfill non-enforceable contracts. We also show that some borrowers violate the axiom of first-order stochastic dominance when rejecting loan offers. This seems partly to be due to negative reciprocity, but may also reflect that there are individuals who have a preference for not accepting something referred to as a “loan.”

Full text (Wiley Online Library)


Published July 4, 2014 1:23 PM