Ownership and cost-sharing contracts

By Espen R. Moen and Dag Morten Dalen

Published in

Australian Economic Papers, Sept 2012, 5 (3), pages 134 - 146

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.2012.00428.x



We discuss the relative merits of public and private ownership in an incomplete contract framework developed by Hart, Shleifer and Vishney (HSV). We add two new elements to their model. First, the government may offer cost-sharing contracts when procuring the good. Second, the owner of a private firm may divert resources that increase their own profit/utility but increase total costs. The cost sharing contract allows the government to reduce the private firm’s incentives to dump quality in order to save on costs. However, this also leads to resource diversion, which increases total costs.We derive the preferred mode of ownership when the government optimally chooses the power of the cost sharing scheme.We find that the presence of quality-reducing cost reductions only favours government ownership if the scope for resource diversion is substantial. A discussion of when  resource diversion is likely to be important is also provided.

Fulltext (pdf)

By Espen R. Moen and Dag Morten Dalen
Published Aug. 16, 2013 2:16 PM - Last modified Sep. 13, 2013 3:13 PM